Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #165142
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file |
| Date | 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rasmS-37R-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r9MH0-Wy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rapfk-TU-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rarqN-2vx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tuesday 08 March 2016 15:07:35 Haines Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:46:14PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > > It sounds as though your Jessie is being identified as Wheezy. > > > > > You get that warning with Wheezy, even if it is 64bit Wheezy > > > > > with 64bit Google-Chrome. Presumably because Google hasn't > > > > > written a string of different error messages for the various > > > > > different things it has just stopped supporting. > > > > > > > > > > Why Jessie is being identified as Wheezy is another question. > > > > > Is there any reason why you might get identified as Ubuntu > > > > > 12.04? Another of the things that has just dropped off Google's > > > > > cliff. > > > > > > > > > > Lisi > > > > > > > > Lisi, I have to make a confession. The machine is actually running > > > > devuan Jessie. That is probably the reason. > > > > > > Glad we have solved the mystery - though sadly not your problem. :-( > > > > A potential solution to the problem would be Jessie proper, but without > > systemd. It seems to work rather well, in fact, from what people doing > > so say. I am about to cross my fingers and try it myself. > > Lisi > > In thinking about it, I'm not sure now if I installed the devuan ISO or > debian Jessie and then removed systemd. As I tell my wife, I always am > thinking about higher things! How would I know at this point which I > did? :-)) But if you installed Jessie proper without systemd you shouldn't be having the Google-Chrome problems - and we are back to square one!! Lisi
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Haines Brown <haines@histomat.net> - 2016-03-06 20:40 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2016-03-06 20:50 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 20:50 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2016-03-06 21:10 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Haines Brown <haines@histomat.net> - 2016-03-07 00:20 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 00:50 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Haines Brown <haines@histomat.net> - 2016-03-07 01:40 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 16:00 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Haines Brown <haines@histomat.net> - 2016-03-07 18:20 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 19:40 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 13:50 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Haines Brown <haines@histomat.net> - 2016-03-08 16:10 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-08 17:30 +0100
csiph-web