Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #158928
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? |
| Date | 2015-10-12 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qix8e-4PI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qi4SC-5Rh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qiwvw-3Qd-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qiwvw-3Qd-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sunday 11 October 2015 22:33:16 Timothy Hobbs wrote: > Please don't go all pedantic on us! > > On 10/11/15 23:31, Chris Bannister wrote: > > Please don't top post on the debian-user mailing list. > > > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 01:57:11PM -0500, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > >> El 11/10/15 a las 13:13, moxalt escribió: > >>> Seriously, though, as much as you dread returning to lynx, it is the > >>> most bandwith-friendly option on the table. If you don't want videos of > >>> any kind, and are content with just plaintext (and separately > >>> downloadable images) you should be safe. What's so bad about lynx? > >> > >> Last time I checked, most sites don't display properly with lynx > >> because > >> they are not designed for text-based browses. All on the contrary, > >> most web > >> sites are full of useless images, but nonetheless, not displaying them > >> breaks those sites. > > > > I haven't found that at all. In fact pressing the '*' key loads all > > images, which you could download if you wanted. > > > >> There may be application for those browsers (like reading HTML manuals > >> that > >> have minimal formatting), but obviously they are not suitable for > >> ordinary > >> browsing. > > > > au contraire, I find lynx good for the majority of the sites that I > > visit. It's only on the rare occasion I do need to use iceweasel. > > > > I even use it for youtube to get the link then use cclive to download > > the video, of course I have to change to the GUI to watch it though. :) > > Please don't go all pedantic on us! It's not pedantic. It makes the thread readable instead of incomprehensible. Lisi
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Video-UNfriendly browsers? brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2015-10-10 18:10 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Mario Castelán Castro <marioxcc.MT@yandex.com> - 2015-10-10 18:20 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 18:40 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 19:00 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2015-10-11 07:00 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-10-11 13:20 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-10-10 19:40 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Mario Castelán Castro <marioxcc.MT@yandex.com> - 2015-10-10 19:50 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-10-10 20:00 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Timothy Hobbs <timothy@hobbs.cz> - 2015-10-10 20:20 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Timothy Hobbs <timothy@hobbs.cz> - 2015-10-10 21:20 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-10-10 21:20 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2015-10-10 20:10 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2015-10-10 21:00 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Timothy Hobbs <timothy@hobbs.cz> - 2015-10-10 21:40 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Timothy Hobbs <timothy@hobbs.cz> - 2015-10-10 21:40 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Carl Fink <carl@finknetwork.com> - 2015-10-10 22:30 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2015-10-10 23:10 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2015-10-10 22:40 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-10-10 21:20 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> - 2015-10-10 21:50 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> - 2015-10-10 22:00 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Timothy Hobbs <timothy@hobbs.cz> - 2015-10-10 22:10 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> - 2015-10-10 22:30 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2015-10-11 12:00 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? moxalt <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2015-10-11 20:20 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Mario Castelán Castro <marioxcc.MT@yandex.com> - 2015-10-11 21:10 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Timothy Hobbs <timothy@hobbs.cz> - 2015-10-11 23:40 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 00:20 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 02:00 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-10-12 07:00 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-10-11 23:40 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2015-10-12 00:30 +0200
Re: Video-UNfriendly browsers? Gener Badenas <gener.ong.badenas@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 04:50 +0200
csiph-web