Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #275570

Re: Firefox alternatives?

Path csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!newsfeed.endofthelinebbs.com!news.corradoroberto.it!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From "Jeremy Nicoll" <jn.ml.dbi.73@letterboxes.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Firefox alternatives?
Date Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:10:02 +0100
Message-ID <JSQb0-gowZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <JSQb0-gowZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JSBF0-gbQp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JSBF0-gbQp-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JSEWd-ge9j-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JSFpg-geiC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JSFyV-gelQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JSGlj-geQL-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Thu Dec 12 12:01:19 2024
Old-Return-Path <jn.ml.dbi.73@letterboxes.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.647 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .letterboxes. - helo: .fout-a3-smtp.messagingengine. - helo-domain: .messagingengine.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
X-Me-Sender <xms:etBaZ-_voFdJJLVOm4JmWB6jA_n9jUp0bEupsPXSFLBJFsC1QGujlgCb> <xme:etBaZ-v-YKGH8puD1tLQTQ_1e5V4clo9UMVwS-TiOgIQIf6psdOdoVLhQtjKcuQ-e w-8aKuf3mDXk7ub>
X-Me-Proxy-Cause gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrkeehgdefgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnth hsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefoggffhffvkfgjfhfutgfgsehtjeertdertddtnecu hfhrohhmpedflfgvrhgvmhihucfpihgtohhllhdfuceojhhnrdhmlhdruggsihdrjeefse hlvghtthgvrhgsohigvghsrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeuheejjeelueev tdelgeetfeevtdevheehieeutdegieethefhgeehueetteefleenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjnhdrmhhlrdgusghirdejfees lhgvthhtvghrsghogigvshdrohhrghdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmh htphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdruggvsghi rghnrdhorhhg
X-Me-Proxy <xmx:etBaZ0AEWJ0zmAIgRuc-UkrRnOqJ_cPIR0Bmqg5ZaWZz9JKphJ4tdA> <xmx:etBaZ2e7LsLwH5_PMx11ZMj3l3E55ExcKEpvhI8AdgW5rPy8AfWTsA> <xmx:etBaZzMZfPvP-7SmIO5OwPqLm7wJS-PGr3Tq5iI65_LnEidfzTyExA> <xmx:etBaZwkpZYgvf1y9Y8Gxb_RjPDZq5XHCRdHJQeyEmqvselkCIgondg> <xmx:etBaZ1VpiXhKLLfhCgILlpQ8x1p9SeArQapsjktnLTGfCulTSWnZhrVi>
Feedback-ID i1ea9464b:Fastmail
X-Mailer MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/817904
List-ID <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/74b4e183-4aa6-44b6-903b-133c8ee1601a@app.fastmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 20
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Thu, 12 Dec 2024 12:00:36 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <74b4e183-4aa6-44b6-903b-133c8ee1601a@app.fastmail.com>
X-Original-References <34fbaf418b8b9c621e76cd72f4ee343dfb536bd1.camel.ref@sbcglobal.net> <34fbaf418b8b9c621e76cd72f4ee343dfb536bd1.camel@sbcglobal.net> <pvoo3wjcbknsjbx33tc2abhw4ahe2c6khj5673yvapzakefvyw@i5cbqau3ag3j> <Z1ou0vl+KnwoG3Y2@mail.bitfolk.com> <qg4zwpoclmvbrkykmem75hulqraloo35pj2zsdbfsujxx4ahdg@3sfcpjzle2zg> <210469b22d0443768862bfbb30f7b558c1067717.camel@sbcglobal.net>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.user:275570

Show key headers only | View raw


On Thu, 12 Dec 2024, at 01:20, Van Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-12-11 at 18:42 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> > You have four times the RAM of the OP. 4G is incredibly marginal
>> spec
>> > for a desktop 2024.
>
> The first computer I was paid to write software for, in 1966, had 1,400
> 6-bit characters...

Yes, performance has moved on a lot...

Does your version of Firefox have the task manager feature - here, (using
FF 115.18.0esr on Windows) that's offered via the application hamburger
menu (at extreme rhs of toolbar in my FF) - More tools - Task Manager 
... and it runs in one tab a monitor tool showing memory & cpu
consumption of each of the tabs that FF is processing.  You might be able 
to judge better which of your tabs are the hogs, if you can run that.

-- 
Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Firefox alternatives? Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2024-12-12 01:10 +0100
  Re: Firefox alternatives? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-12-12 01:40 +0100
    Re: Firefox alternatives? Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2024-12-12 01:50 +0100
      Re: Firefox alternatives? eben@gmx.us - 2024-12-12 02:00 +0100
      1401, was Re: Firefox alternatives? "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2024-12-12 02:40 +0100
      Re: Firefox alternatives? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-12-12 09:20 +0100
        Re: Firefox alternatives? jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 10:00 +0100
        Re: Firefox alternatives? "Roy J. Tellason, Sr." <roy@rtellason.com> - 2024-12-12 19:50 +0100
      Re: Firefox alternatives? "Jeremy Nicoll" <jn.ml.dbi.73@letterboxes.org> - 2024-12-12 13:10 +0100
        Re: Firefox alternatives? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-12-12 13:20 +0100
          Re: Firefox alternatives? "Jeremy Nicoll" <jn.ml.dbi.73@letterboxes.org> - 2024-12-12 14:10 +0100

csiph-web