Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #268805
| From | Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd |
| Date | 2024-04-10 21:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IrLkR-5oON-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <IrE01-5kDT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 7:00 AM Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote: > > On one machine, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2023-10-07 13:43:24 /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> /lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket > > and on another one, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2024-01-05 16:54:09 /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> /usr/lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket > > These symlinks were created at Debian installation time, and in > both cases, the dmeventd version is 2:1.02.196-1+b1. > > Shouldn't the system ensure that symlinks are consistent on different > machines (even though the above symlinks are equivalent), for instance > to ease the comparison of configurations between machines? > > For instance, shouldn't usr-is-merged convert the symlinks to a > canonical path? Be careful of fiddling with the Systemd symlinks. If you convert the relative ones to absolute ones, then the machine will fail to boot. Jeff
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2024-04-10 13:10 +0200
Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2024-04-10 16:20 +0200
Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2024-04-11 04:10 +0200
Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2024-04-11 19:50 +0200
Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-04-12 21:10 +0200
Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-04-11 07:10 +0200
Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-04-10 16:30 +0200
Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-04-10 21:00 +0200
Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-04-12 21:10 +0200
csiph-web