Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #268597
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Lee <ler762@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: making Debian secure by default |
| Date | Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:10:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <In2ml-2kVP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ImJa1-27aa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ImKz7-28aw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ImPyN-2bh9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ImY94-2heG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ImZRv-2iJ8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-user@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Thu Mar 28 18:02:57 2024 |
| Old-Return-Path | <ler762@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-6.949 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5.5 |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AOJu0YxkmxwjizhbNTLfn6veYzw4iqQBPSfnEy4fRrvIX/FS5PAuWZ5c sFJAZwB1Z2Qx9yVzbRUnkPRsbQZPSVxn98SSKBvUXvs366d+jVOLiL5l2xnJPL9hkm7wWoc4vHl RcLqsb5cSDjb303Sqd6aRm+vuDrYL/i3axFAYzQ== |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | AGHT+IE/mA83woD837TX8YFXIklE1zsx6nrBpJTw3L+HetC3Z6aNpnF18Od0gAc/bFgaTpILnv/uKqAZhJYN0qnrg4s= |
| X-Received | by 2002:a6b:e614:0:b0:7d0:6295:fc3b with SMTP id g20-20020a6be614000000b007d06295fc3bmr4494355ioh.9.1711648953138; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:02:33 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/810553 |
| List-ID | <debian-user.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAD8GWsvr0BQykcq-m9fQoHFi05FTWkSFH=HZykM0t91CxQu-rA@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 49 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:02:20 -0400 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CAD8GWsvr0BQykcq-m9fQoHFi05FTWkSFH=HZykM0t91CxQu-rA@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <CAD8GWssBoRrCzW0TSUGxMeuY=y_bTM-nMuSO7_4g1Kyk79fgqQ@mail.gmail.com> <ZgSljhflfCtsnnCq@mail.bitfolk.com> <CAD8GWsswLPH327tvj64HkWuMfayXczJyyviSk9Um2CAHHjoovg@mail.gmail.com> <ZgVw+HFmMseszOcm@mail.bitfolk.com> <ZgWLmLCjcOTqhk2a@wooledge.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.user:268597 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:24 AM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 01:30:32PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > > I'm just not sure that you'll find any "hardening" guide that will > > specifically say "disable writing to your terminal as there might be > > a bug in a binary that is setgid tty" before yesterday's reveal that > > there is such a bug in "wall". > > > > The more general advice to audit every setuid/setgid binary is more > > likely to be present. > [...] > > If the maintainer of util-linux doesn't agree, then the next thing > > I'd try is a bug against the Debian Administrator's Handbook: > > > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-handbook/ > > > > This has a chapter on security, so possibly it would be appropriate > > to mention "m,esg n" there. > > A more proactive endeavor would be to document known best practices > on the wiki. A quick search found a couple pages that might serve > as starting points: > > https://wiki.debian.org/SecurityManagement > https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening -- says it's for package maintainers > > Anyone who is serious about such a project probably has a long road ahead > of them. Is there a generally preferred web link checker program for Debian? I took a look at https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-manual/ch04s15.en.html and the 4.15. Protecting against buffer overflows section has this bit: recompile the source code to introduce proper checks that prevent overflows, using the http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/ patch for GCC (which is used by http://www.adamantix.org) http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/ patch gives me a connect failed and http://www.adamantix.org sends me to a vietnamese tv site?? Seems to me that an easy first step would be to check that all the links still work. Regards, Lee
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
making Debian secure by default Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-03-27 22:40 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-28 00:10 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 05:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-28 14:40 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-03-28 16:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-03-28 16:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 19:20 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Ralph Aichinger <ra@h5.or.at> - 2024-03-29 08:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2024-03-29 20:10 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-03-29 20:40 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-28 17:00 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 21:20 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2024-03-28 18:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 20:40 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-29 18:00 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2024-03-29 18:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2024-03-29 18:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2024-04-01 02:30 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-04-01 03:50 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2024-04-01 05:00 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2024-04-01 10:40 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-04-06 09:50 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2024-04-06 09:50 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-04-06 09:51 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-04-06 09:50 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-04-06 09:50 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2024-04-06 09:51 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-04-06 09:51 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-04-06 09:51 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2024-04-06 09:52 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2024-04-06 09:52 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-04-06 09:51 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2024-04-06 09:51 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2024-04-06 09:52 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2024-04-06 09:52 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2024-04-06 09:52 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2024-03-29 18:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-29 21:00 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2024-03-30 17:10 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 19:10 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 23:20 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> - 2024-03-28 17:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> - 2024-03-28 18:10 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-03-28 18:10 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> - 2024-03-28 18:10 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 00:40 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-28 00:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 05:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-03-28 06:20 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> - 2024-03-28 06:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-03-28 08:20 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-03-28 12:20 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> - 2024-03-28 12:40 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-03-28 21:40 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> - 2024-03-29 10:40 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-03-30 04:00 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2024-03-28 15:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 17:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-28 18:10 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 21:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default tomas@tuxteam.de - 2024-03-28 18:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 20:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-03-28 20:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-03-28 21:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default tomas@tuxteam.de - 2024-03-28 21:20 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2024-03-29 17:10 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-03-29 21:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-03-28 22:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Marc SCHAEFER <schaefer@alphanet.ch> - 2024-03-28 12:10 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Franco Martelli <martellif67@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 17:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Michel Verdier <mv524@free.fr> - 2024-03-28 17:30 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-28 17:40 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-03-28 21:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2024-03-28 21:50 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-03-29 16:40 +0100
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-31 21:10 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2024-03-31 21:30 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-03-31 22:30 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-31 23:20 +0200
Re: making Debian secure by default gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-04-01 01:00 +0200
csiph-web