Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #268577
| From | Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? |
| Date | 2024-03-28 14:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ImY94-2heG-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <IjIWS-b9R-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <IjOzf-fuL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ik4aZ-psP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ikc8y-umf-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2024-03-20 22:58, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024, 11:28 AM Jesper Dybdal > <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> wrote: > > I have now done the following: > * Checked the RAID array - no problems found. > * Run fsck. It found three cases of the block count being > incorrect. I > don't know which the other two affected files are. > * Run one pass of memtest86+. Nothing found. > > So it seems not to be a problem with the disks. > A bug in ext4? Well, ext4 has always done its job for me wihtout > problems. > A RAM error that memtest86+ did not find? Possible. Once upon a > time, > when you bought an ordinary pc, its RAM had ECC as a matter of > course; > unfortunately, that is not the case nowadays. > > I think I'll let memtest86+ run overnight one of the coming nights. > > Unless it is simply a RAM error, then it is a bit scary... > > I've now let memtest86+ run for 8 hours, during which i did 14 passes of all its tests. It found nothing wrong. > I have seen that a couple times, unlikely but possible. Maybe review > your RAM configuration too, ensure that the sticks are on the same > supported refresh rate and distributed across the slots in an approved > way. > > Regards, > Jesper > > On 2024-03-19 21:47, Franco Martelli wrote: > > On 19/03/24 at 15:43, Jesper Dybdal wrote: > > > >> > >> My plan is to boot a rescue disk and mount that partition > read-only. > >> Then: > >> * If the file looks ok after reboot, then I'll strongly suspect > the > >> RAM - and run memtest. > >> * Otherwise, I'll have to run fsck and see what happens. > >> > >> kernel version: > >> root@nuser:~# uname -a > >> Linux nuser 5.10.0-28-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.209-2 (2024-01-31) > >> x86_64 GNU/Linux > >> > >> The partition in question is a RAID 1 controlled by md. > > > > Another check you can perform it is on the RAID array, by > default it > > runs on the first Sunday of each month at 00:57. You should have > this > > file /etc/cron.d/mdadm that takes care to run this check monthly. > > > > Before you reboot, does it look OK /proc/mdstat ? > > > > -- > Jesper Dybdal > https://www.dybdal.dk > > > -- Jesper Dybdal https://www.dybdal.dk
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> - 2024-03-19 15:50 +0100
Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Franco Martelli <martellif67@gmail.com> - 2024-03-19 21:50 +0100
Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> - 2024-03-20 09:20 +0100
Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Franco Martelli <martellif67@gmail.com> - 2024-03-20 16:10 +0100
Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> - 2024-03-20 14:30 +0100
Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2024-03-20 23:00 +0100
Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> - 2024-03-28 14:40 +0100
Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> - 2024-03-28 15:00 +0100
Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-03-28 15:10 +0100
Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> - 2024-03-28 16:10 +0100
Re: Filsystemkorruption i ext4? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-03-28 16:40 +0100
csiph-web