Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #268106
| From | debian-user@howorth.org.uk |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Spam from the list? |
| Date | 2024-03-06 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <If35T-eQwX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <IeX0t-eML1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IeZ2h-eNVS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <If081-eONf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <If0B3-eOWK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> wrote: > HI Brad, > > I do not believe, it is a training problem. Why? Well, your formerly > mail was marked as spam. So I marked it as ham. Now, your second mail > again is marked as spam. > > We know, there is nothing unusual with your mail, but it is again > marked as spam. Even, when I explicity marked your mails as ham! > > Thus the problem is not on my computer. > > I believe, what Thomas said: Megamail or my mailprovider is setting > the X- Spam-Flag to YES, and my spamassassin is recognizing this and > marks this as spam. > > The solution would be, either to make megamails or my provider make > things correctly (but I have no atom bombs to force them) , or delete > my rule, to check the X-Spam-Flag (which I actually do not want). You don't need an atom bomb. Simply contact their support and tell them they appear to be misclassifying mail. If they don't fix the problem then consider changing your provider. Or at least tell them you will :) Also they are still sending the mail to you, so it is your choice whether to actually classify it as spam! Look at your mail program and see what options it has regarding classifying spam. Change it to not respect the particular header you think is causing problems. > Important is: The cause is not at debian server (which is fine!) and > not on my system (which is also fine), but on the provider server. > > To know this, I think we can safely close this issue. > > We have learnt some things (which is always important) and could find > the reason. > > Thank you all for your help and input!!
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Spam from the list? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-03-06 11:50 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2024-03-06 12:20 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-03-06 12:30 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-03-06 13:20 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2024-03-06 12:30 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-03-06 12:40 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2024-03-06 13:00 +0100
Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Spam from the list? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-03-06 14:00 +0100
Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Spam from the list? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-03-06 14:00 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2024-03-06 14:30 +0100
Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Spam from the list? Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2024-03-06 14:50 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2024-03-06 15:10 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-03-06 15:40 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-03-06 18:20 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-03-07 09:50 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? Byunghee HWANG <soyeomul@doraji.xyz> - 2024-03-07 12:00 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-07 13:10 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? John Crawley <john@bunsenlabs.org> - 2024-03-08 02:20 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2024-03-08 03:20 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-08 12:50 +0100
Re: Spam from the list? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2024-03-08 14:00 +0100
csiph-web