Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #270110

Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days

From Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days
Date 2024-06-16 01:20 +0200
Message-ID <IPKQF-3dq2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <IPirn-2Vht-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IPiKK-2VDw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <IPjdL-2VNg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IPKnD-3cZS-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization less than infinite

Show all headers | View raw


Mike composed on 2024-06-15 23:47 (UTC+0100):

> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 01:49:08PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:

>> The following applies with all FOSS drivers I've ever used except possibly mga:
>> vga= only works until KMS starts. video= does the desired job while KMS is
>> engaged. e.g.

>> 	video=DP-1:1440x900@60

>> Causes 1440x900 with refresh 60Hz to be applied only to DP-1. Leave off DP-1: to
>> have it applied to all displays. Leave off @60 to allow the system to determine
>> refresh.

>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/fb/modedb.txt

> I tried the video= and it made no difference.
...
> Any ideas?

How many tries? More than one refresh? Without refresh? With other resolutions?
Without limit to one port?

> I seem to recall reading that the Nvidia driver was a bit cavalier and
> reinvented various parts of X, so I wondered if there was some crazyness

It wouldn't surprise me at all. I didn't see you mention NVidia's driver before
now. I would search for and/or bring this issue up on NVidia's forum site. I have
no ideas how VT output is managed with proprietary drivers engaged.

Maybe this is one of those cases where nosimplefb=1 is needed on cmdline?
-- 
Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
	based on faith, not based on science.

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Virtual Terminal has seen better days Mike <debian@norgie.net> - 2024-06-14 19:00 +0200
  Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-06-14 19:20 +0200
    Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Mike <debian@norgie.net> - 2024-06-14 19:30 +0200
      Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-06-17 14:50 +0200
    Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2024-06-14 19:50 +0200
      Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Mike <debian@norgie.net> - 2024-06-16 00:50 +0200
        Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2024-06-16 01:20 +0200

csiph-web