Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #270110
| From | Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days |
| Date | 2024-06-16 01:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IPKQF-3dq2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <IPirn-2Vht-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IPiKK-2VDw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <IPjdL-2VNg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IPKnD-3cZS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | less than infinite |
Mike composed on 2024-06-15 23:47 (UTC+0100): > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 01:49:08PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> The following applies with all FOSS drivers I've ever used except possibly mga: >> vga= only works until KMS starts. video= does the desired job while KMS is >> engaged. e.g. >> video=DP-1:1440x900@60 >> Causes 1440x900 with refresh 60Hz to be applied only to DP-1. Leave off DP-1: to >> have it applied to all displays. Leave off @60 to allow the system to determine >> refresh. >> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/fb/modedb.txt > I tried the video= and it made no difference. ... > Any ideas? How many tries? More than one refresh? Without refresh? With other resolutions? Without limit to one port? > I seem to recall reading that the Nvidia driver was a bit cavalier and > reinvented various parts of X, so I wondered if there was some crazyness It wouldn't surprise me at all. I didn't see you mention NVidia's driver before now. I would search for and/or bring this issue up on NVidia's forum site. I have no ideas how VT output is managed with proprietary drivers engaged. Maybe this is one of those cases where nosimplefb=1 is needed on cmdline? -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Virtual Terminal has seen better days Mike <debian@norgie.net> - 2024-06-14 19:00 +0200
Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-06-14 19:20 +0200
Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Mike <debian@norgie.net> - 2024-06-14 19:30 +0200
Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-06-17 14:50 +0200
Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2024-06-14 19:50 +0200
Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Mike <debian@norgie.net> - 2024-06-16 00:50 +0200
Re: Virtual Terminal has seen better days Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2024-06-16 01:20 +0200
csiph-web