Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #269874
| From | David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: advanced scripting problems - or wrong approach? |
| Date | 2024-06-03 18:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ILigh-li3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <IKs81-hoPx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IKxAJ-hssl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ILigh-li3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ILigh-li3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 6/2/24 21:35, DdB wrote:
> Am 02.06.2024 um 02:41 schrieb DdB:
>> Will share my findings, once i made more progress...
>
> Here is what i've got before utilizing it:
>
>
>> datakanja@PBuster-NFox:/mnt/tmp$ cat test
>> #!/bin/bash -e
>> # testing usefulness of coprocess to control host and backup machine from a single script.
>> # beware: do not use subprocesses or pipes, as that will confuse the pipes setup by coproc!
>> # At this point, this interface may not be very flexible
>> # but trying to follow best practices for using coproc in bash scripts
>> # todo (deferred): how to handle stderr inside coproc?
>> # todo (deferred): what, if coproc dies unexpectedly?
>>
>> # setting up the coprocess:
>> stdout_to_ssh_stdin=5 # arbitrary choice outside the range of used file desciptors
>> stdin_from_ssh_stdout=6
>>
>> coproc SSH { bash; } # for testing purposes, i refrain from really involving ssh just yet and replace it with bash:
>>
>> # save filedescriptors by duplicating them:
>> eval "exec ${stdin_from_ssh_stdout}<&${SSH[0]} ${stdout_to_ssh_stdin}>&${SSH[1]}"
>> echo The PID of the coproc is: $SSH_PID # possibly useful for inspection
>>
>> unique_eof_delimirer="<EOF>"
>> line=""
>> # collect the output available and print it locally (synchonous):
>> function print-immediate-output () {
>> while IFS= read -r -u "${stdin_from_ssh_stdout}" line
>> do
>> if [[ "${line:0-5:5}" == "$unique_eof_delimirer" ]] # currently, the length is fixed
>> then
>> line="${line%<EOF>}"
>> if [[ ! -z $line ]]
>> then
>> printf '%s\n' "$line"
>> fi
>> break
>> fi
>> printf '%s\n' "$line"
>> done
>> }
>>
>> # send a single command via ssh and print output locally
>> function send-single-ssh-command () {
>> printf '%s\n' "$@" >&"${stdout_to_ssh_stdin}"
>> printf '%s\n' "echo '"$unique_eof_delimirer"'" >&"${stdout_to_ssh_stdin}"
>> print-immediate-output
>> }
>>
>>
>> send-single-ssh-command "find . -maxdepth 1 -name [a-z]\*" # more or less a standard command, that succeeds
>> send-single-ssh-command "ls nothin" # more or less a standard command, that fails
>>
>> # tearing down the coprocess:
>> printf "%s\n" "exit" >&"${stdout_to_ssh_stdin}" # not interested in any more output (probably none)
>> wait
>> # Descriptors must be closed to prevent leaking.
>> eval "exec ${stdin_from_ssh_stdout}<&- ${stdout_to_ssh_stdin}>-"
>>
>> echo "waited for the coproc to end gracefully, done"
>>
>> datakanja@PBuster-NFox:/mnt/tmp$ ./test
>> The PID of the coproc is: 28154
>> ./test
>> ./out
>> ls: Zugriff auf 'nothin' nicht möglich: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
>> waited for the coproc to end gracefully, done
>> datakanja@PBuster-NFox:/mnt/tmp$
"test" is both a program and a shell builtin. I suggest that you pick
another, non-keyword, name for your script.
I suggest adding the Bash option "-u' (nounset).
Your file descriptor duplication, redirection, etc., seems overly
complex. Would not it be easier to use the coproc handles directly?
2024-06-03 08:49:41 dpchrist@laalaa ~/sandbox/bash
$ nl coproc-demo
1 #!/usr/bin/env bash
2 # $Id: coproc-demo,v 1.3 2024/06/03 15:49:36 dpchrist Exp $
3 set -e
4 set -u
5 coproc COPROC { bash ; }
6 echo 'echo "hello, world!"' >&"${COPROC[1]}"
7 read -r reply <&"${COPROC[0]}"
8 echo $reply
9 echo "exit" >&"${COPROC[1]}"
10 wait $COPROC_PID
2024-06-03 08:49:44 dpchrist@laalaa ~/sandbox/bash
$ bash -x coproc-demo
+ set -e
+ set -u
+ echo 'echo "hello, world!"'
+ bash
+ read -r reply
+ echo hello, 'world!'
hello, world!
+ echo exit
+ wait 4229
David
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: advanced scripting problems - or wrong approach? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-06-01 16:10 +0200 Re: advanced scripting problems - or wrong approach? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-06-03 18:00 +0200
csiph-web