Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #269223

Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail

From Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail
Date 2024-05-07 18:30 +0200
Message-ID <IBvRv-bK09-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <IB6gp-buny-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <IB6zL-buuU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IB7vP-bv5W-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <IBrux-bHif-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/05/2024 18:40, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
> On 2024-05-06 16:24, Max Nikulin wrote:
>> 2. It does not skip x-scheme-handler/* entries. Are there applications 
>> that may use such entries?

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291015
mime-support: run‐mailcap to understand URL notation and start 
sensible-browser if required.

A kind of proposal to support x-scheme-handler entries.

> On 2024-05-06 17:04, Max Nikulin wrote:
>> So doubled backslashes (as in .desktop files) are correct.
>>
>> What is wrong is lack of backslashes added before ";" and it is a bug.
>>
> I have now removed the "x-scheme-handler/mailto" entry

I do not think they really hurt, however they are most complex entries, 
so chance that some parser would be confused is higher.

> and added backslashes in all the
> emacsclient entries in mailcap, and the error messages are gone.

If these edits are outside of user section then entries may be 
regenerated to original form during installing of some package. Please, 
consider filing a bug report.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> - 2024-05-06 15:10 +0200
  Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-05-06 15:30 +0200
    Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> - 2024-05-06 16:10 +0200
    Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 16:30 +0200
      Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 17:10 +0200
      Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-user@dybdal.dk> - 2024-05-07 13:50 +0200
        Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-05-07 18:30 +0200
          Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-05-15 18:00 +0200
            Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail "Jonathan Dowland" <jmtd@debian.org> - 2024-05-16 09:50 +0200
              Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-05-17 13:00 +0200
                Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail "Jonathan Dowland" <jmtd@debian.org> - 2024-05-20 11:50 +0200
            Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Jesper Dybdal <jesper@dybdal.dk> - 2024-05-17 22:50 +0200
  Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-05-06 17:00 +0200
    Re: Bookworm's /etc/mailcap seems to break s-nail Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 17:10 +0200

csiph-web