Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #266880
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Q: Gnome network odd |
| Date | 2024-02-02 17:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I34TL-7p9l-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <I1Pap-6xkJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I1Pap-6xkJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <I1QpP-6yef-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I2wIq-6YEa-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I2Wjw-7jvH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri 02 Feb 2024 at 07:37:34 (+0000), Tixy wrote: > On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 22:12 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > I also have a more vague memory that you could put config into > > > /etc/network/interfaces then in some circumstance NetworkManager > > > would > > > not try and manage that interface, and in others it would take > > > over. > > > (Perhaps selected by allow hotplug option in the ifupdown config?) > > > > That seems unlikely. Perhaps you're thinking of NM's ifupdown plugin > > that allows you to use the configuration in /e/n/i. I'm assuming the > > OP has not installed that in their sleep. > > They wouldn't need to because it looks like it's shipped with the main > network-manage package which contains various files with 'plugin' in > their name, including libnm-settings-plugin-ifupdown.so. What I said was unlikely is that an option in ifupdown's configuration, /e/n/i, would control NM's behaviour. It's the mere mention of the interface there, as in iface enp5s0 inet dhcp that makes ifupdown control it, and makes NM back off, AIUI. > As we've seen from the OPs latest reply, the plugin is configured to > not manage interfaces. Right, and so the default NM configuration (ifupdown plugin present, news to me) and [ifupdown] // managed=false in the .conf file, means that NM should not, by default, configure any interface mentioned in /e/n/i. In the OP's case, the original /e/n/i: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 433 Oct 4 17:23 interfaces.orig is big enough to hold a typical lo+eth+wlan configuration, which we haven't seen yet. Cheers, David.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Q: Gnome network odd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-01-29 16:40 +0100
Re: Q: Gnome network odd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-01-30 06:50 +0100
Re: Q: Gnome network odd Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2024-01-30 08:10 +0100
Re: Q: Gnome network odd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-01 05:20 +0100
Re: Q: Gnome network odd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-02 03:30 +0100
Re: Q: Gnome network odd Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2024-02-02 08:40 +0100
Re: Q: Gnome network odd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-02 17:50 +0100
Re: Q: Gnome network odd David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-04 20:50 +0100
Re: Q: Gnome network odd Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-02-25 04:30 +0100
csiph-web