Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #262217
| From | Steve Keller <keller.steve@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Understanding package dependencies |
| Date | 2023-10-07 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Hmei7-e9Z4-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
I've always thought, that a package's dependencies must be full-filled
to install that package and that apt-get automatically manages these
dependencies. And also, that if I remove a package, that all other
packages are removed, that depend on it. Like this:
# aptitude purge bind9-libs
The following packages will be REMOVED:
bind9-libs{p} libjemalloc2{u}
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 4668 kB will be freed.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
bind9-host : Depends: bind9-libs (= 1:9.18.19-1~deb12u1) but it is not going to be installed
bind9 : Depends: bind9-libs (= 1:9.18.19-1~deb12u1) but it is not going to be installed
bind9-dnsutils : Depends: bind9-libs (= 1:9.18.19-1~deb12u1) but it is not going to be installed
bind9-utils : Depends: bind9-libs (= 1:9.18.19-1~deb12u1) but it is not going to be installed
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
Remove the following packages:
1) bind9 [1:9.18.19-1~deb12u1 (now, stable-security)]
2) bind9-dnsutils [1:9.18.19-1~deb12u1 (now, stable-security)]
3) bind9-host [1:9.18.19-1~deb12u1 (now, stable-security)]
4) bind9-utils [1:9.18.19-1~deb12u1 (now, stable-security)]
But how can this then be explained?
# aptitude why lsb-base
i ntpsec Depends lsb-base
# aptitude show ntpsec | grep ^Depends
Depends: adduser, lsb-base, netbase, python3, python3-ntp (= 1.2.2+dfsg1-1+deb12u1), tzdata, libbsd0 (>= 0.0), libc6 (>= 2.34), libcap2 (>= 1:2.10), libssl3 (>= 3.0.0)
# aptitude purge lsb-base
The following packages will be REMOVED:
lsb-base{p}
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 12.3 kB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
Won't continuing here leave ntpsec with an unresolved package dependency?
Steve
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Understanding package dependencies Steve Keller <keller.steve@gmx.de> - 2023-10-07 14:10 +0200
Re: Understanding package dependencies Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2023-10-07 15:10 +0200
Re: Understanding package dependencies Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-10-07 15:30 +0200
Re: Understanding package dependencies Steve Keller <keller.steve@gmx.de> - 2023-10-07 19:50 +0200
Re: Understanding package dependencies Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-10-07 20:20 +0200
Re: Understanding package dependencies Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2023-10-07 20:30 +0200
Re: Understanding package dependencies Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-10-07 20:50 +0200
Re: Understanding package dependencies Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2023-10-08 10:50 +0200
Re: Understanding package dependencies Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-10-08 14:40 +0200
Re: Understanding package dependencies Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-10-09 14:20 +0200
csiph-web