Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #262118

List packages from non-default repositories

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject List packages from non-default repositories
Date Tue, 03 Oct 2023 12:20:01 +0200
Message-ID <HkKFr-devd-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Tue Oct 3 10:11:53 2023
Old-Return-Path <gldu-debian-user-2@m.gmane-mx.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-0.925 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPOOFED_FREEMAIL=0.364, SPOOF_GMAIL_MID=1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Content-Language en-US, ru-RU
X-Mailing-List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/803785
List-ID <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ufgpcj$dc8$1@ciao.gmane.io
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 29
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:11:27 +0700
X-Original-Message-ID <ufgpcj$dc8$1@ciao.gmane.io>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.user:262118

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi,

What is the recommended way to find deb packages installed from 
repositories other than stable? My current variant is

   apt list '?narrow(~i, !~Astable|~Astable-backports|!~O^Debian$|~o|~c)'

I can not say that I fully understand how apt-patterns(7) work, so I am 
afraid that I may miss some cases in the expression above. It sounds 
like a FAQ, but have not found a ready to use solution.

A workaround is to remove extra repositories from sources.list and get 
the list by "apt list '~o'", however, I hope, it is not necessary.

Reasons why I have added more repositories are described below.

Till Firefox-115 appeared in bookworm, I had it installed from trixie. 
Fortunately it required just a few packages from testing, so it was 
safe. Now I want to be sure that I have reinstalled versions from stable 
for all of them.

'~i~Atesting' gives a long list filled with false positives because 
currently most of packages have same versions in trixie and bookworm.

In addition I have tried backports kernel to try if Intel wifi driver is 
better there.

Actually I still have a couple of packages from trixie, but they have no 
binary dependencies.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

List packages from non-default repositories Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-10-03 12:20 +0200
  Re: List packages from non-default repositories Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2023-10-03 20:40 +0200
    Re: List packages from non-default repositories Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-10-04 04:30 +0200
      Re: List packages from non-default repositories David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-10-04 07:00 +0200
        Re: List packages from non-default repositories Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-10-04 10:10 +0200
      Re: List packages from non-default repositories Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2023-10-04 10:50 +0200
        Re: List packages from non-default repositories Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-10-04 12:30 +0200
          Re: List packages from non-default repositories Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2023-10-05 11:00 +0200

csiph-web