Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #261690
| From | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: memtest86 |
| Date | 2023-09-15 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Hehd7-99Xt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <HdRLH-8Uz9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <He1i1-90eK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <He1L3-90Ds-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <He6B3-93vz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Hedjb-97HA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>>> latest version is 10.6, get it at:
>>> <https://www.memtest86.com/download.html>
> This, Stefan, looks exactly like the memtest86 we've all been using for
> nearly 30 years.
"we"? I sure haven't run that one, ever. I've run memtest86+ many
times, yes, that's the one that "look like the old familiar one" for me
(and presumably for others who stay away from proprietary code :)
> Possibly under new management, and you may not agree with
> the pro version costing money,
The problem is not the money but the impossibility to know what it is
you're running because you can't see the source code.
> If you think the peanuts are free, check the price of the beer.
Have you ever heard of Free Software (or maybe "open source")? :-)
> And with all the caveats discussed in the faq list, I'll be a bit
> spooky. Like running it w/o a net cable so it can't call home.
Of course the `.com` version won't push all its own caveats in your
face, that would go against its own commercial interests.
That's another advantage of Free Software: it doesn't have a commercial
incentive to hide its limitations in order to trick you into choosing
over some competitor. IOW Free Software encourages honesty.
BTW, you can also run a memory tester from the comfort of a running
Debian machine, using the `memtester` package. Clearly it won't be able
to check *all* the memory of your machine (e.g. it can't access the
memory used by the kernel), but I've anecdotally found it "good enough"
(the two times memtest86+ found a problem in one of my machines,
`memtester` also found a problem on that machine).
Stefan
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
memtest86 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2023-09-13 16:20 +0200
Re: memtest86 "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2023-09-13 18:50 +0200
Re: memtest86 gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-09-13 21:50 +0200
Re: memtest86 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2023-09-13 22:40 +0200
Re: memtest86 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2023-09-13 22:50 +0200
Re: memtest86 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2023-09-13 23:00 +0200
Re: memtest86 "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 12:40 +0200
Re: memtest86 "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 12:30 +0200
Re: memtest86 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 22:40 +0200
Re: memtest86 gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-09-14 23:10 +0200
Re: memtest86 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-09-15 04:20 +0200
Re: memtest86 Michel Verdier <mv524@free.fr> - 2023-09-15 09:10 +0200
Re: memtest86 gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-09-15 11:30 +0200
Re: memtest86 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-09-15 15:40 +0200
Re: memtest86 gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-09-15 18:30 +0200
Re: memtest86 Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2023-09-15 19:50 +0200
Re: memtest86 gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-09-15 20:30 +0200
Re: memtest86 Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2023-09-18 21:30 +0200
Re: memtest86 Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2023-09-14 23:20 +0200
Re: memtest86 (solved) Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 13:40 +0200
csiph-web