Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew

Path	csiph.com!news.neodome.net!fu-berlin.de!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Andreas B <panden@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew
Date	Mon, 08 Jan 2024 13:20:01 +0100
Message-ID	<HTWLL-1FCa-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<GKQRr-ZNs-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Mon Jan 8 12:18:13 2024
Old-Return-Path	<panden@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.209 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State	AOJu0Yw4v2hh4XbShSJJ/W3EvoNlFZijhVlA/kUwaSkuINlNDjvjfyS6 4Zd7efVwPDWMjrxxdBFTY+y453RAYkA=
X-Google-SMTP-Source	AGHT+IHXI2qVrdnah+VAbPAO6mMLhOUCopeDMvargO4vOexNdul6V1tBfsT7WEpJcQ7D3+X+VUqHHw==
X-Received	by 2002:ac2:47f0:0:b0:50e:7b28:4573 with SMTP id b16-20020ac247f0000000b0050e7b284573mr1206405lfp.30.1704715299694; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 04:01:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Mailing-List	<debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/807469
List-ID	<debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZZvkItILGufqDP7a@nuc10
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	10
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:01:38 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<ZZvkItILGufqDP7a@nuc10>
X-Original-References	<CAL2+-iXwCzYzv3KY_xg0PCJi+Cpj=X35cf=R=CKrOsrGeJERrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.user:265650

Show key headers only | View raw

A follow up on this.

I recently swapped my ISP's router with my own.
New temp-addresses are now generated when old ones become deprecated, as expected.

I haven't checked thoroughly (yet), but the only immediate difference I can see, is that the router lifetime is 600 seconds (RA).
My ISP's router used a lifetime of 86400 seconds (24h), I think.

Best,
Andreas

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew Andreas B <panden@gmail.com> - 2024-01-08 13:20 +0100
  Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-01-08 13:30 +0100

csiph-web