Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #265119
| From | Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Formal reminder of Codes of Conduct [WAS Re: Could we please cease this thread now?] |
| Date | 2023-12-21 23:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HNzfb-faCI-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HNsdH-f6wJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HNsdH-f6wJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <HNt05-f72I-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HNt05-f72I-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <HNyVP-favU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | occasionally |
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 21:36:00 +0000 "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> wrote: > Replies to you which are specifically marked as replies off-list are > private. Don't repost private information. The normal expectation is > that the list is public and communication to the list is public. > If someone specifically replies to you in private, it would be for an > exceptional reason and should not be reposted back to the list. Clarification, please. Occasionally a miss-configured mail reader will cause a private off-list reply, which the correspondent does not notice. My usual response to that sort of thing is to suggest that the correspondent fix his mail reader, and then reply to the email on-list. But only if there is nothing in either the errant email or my reply to it which I believe to be private. Is something like that within your admonition not to reply on-list to an off-list email? -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fwd: Could we please cease this thread now? [WAS Re: lists] Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com> - 2023-12-21 15:30 +0100
Re: Fwd: Could we please cease this thread now? [WAS Re: lists] Arno Lehmann <al@its-lehmann.de> - 2023-12-21 15:50 +0100
Re: Could we please cease this thread now? [WAS Re: lists] Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2023-12-21 16:20 +0100
Re: Could we please cease this thread now? [WAS Re: lists] Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com> - 2023-12-21 16:20 +0100
Re: Could we please cease this thread now? [WAS Re: lists] Byung-Hee HWANG <soyeomul@doraji.xyz> - 2023-12-21 16:50 +0100
Formal reminder of Codes of Conduct [WAS Re: Could we please cease this thread now?] "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-12-21 22:40 +0100
Re: Formal reminder of Codes of Conduct [WAS Re: Could we please cease this thread now?] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-12-21 23:00 +0100
Clarification: public private replies [WAS Re: Formal reminder of Codes of Conduct] "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-12-21 23:30 +0100
Re: Clarification: public private replies [WAS Re: Formal reminder of Codes of Conduct] David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2023-12-22 00:50 +0100
Re: Clarification: public private replies Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2023-12-22 11:40 +0100
Re: Clarification: public private replies [WAS Re: Formal reminder of Codes of Conduct] Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2023-12-22 13:50 +0100
Re: Clarification: public private replies [WAS Re: Formal reminder of Codes of Conduct] "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-12-23 01:00 +0100
csiph-web