Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #264493
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release |
| Date | 2023-12-09 22:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HJcTT-csMU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HJafn-craF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HJaS5-crCN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HJb1L-crFL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 19:18:20 +0000 Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> wrote: > On 9 Dec 2023 20:54 +0200, from alexis@nanoid.net (Alexis Grigoriou): > > I just upgraded to Bookworm this morning. I did reboot a couple of > > times but there seems to be no problem (yet). Is there anything I > > should look for or do other than rebooting? > > If you upgraded this morning, then I would expect that you are okay > for now. > > Per #5 in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057843 > the bug is present in kernel Debian package version 6.1.64-1. If you > are on 6.1.55-1 (current Bookworm stable per last night) you _likely_ > aren't affected. If you are on 6.1.55-1 (or earlier), just hold off on > upgrades for now; and if you need to upgrade something else, take > great care for now to ensure that no Linux kernel packages get > upgraded to any version < 6.1.66, and preferably not < 6.1.66-1. > > For versions, check: > > * uname -v > * dpkg -l linux-image-\* > > In that bug report thread, #21 lists 6.1.66 as fixed upstream, and #28 > indicates that 6.1.66-1 includes the fix from upstream, and that it is > being published. > It appears from the link in the bug report that 6.5.x kernels (sid/trixie) are not affected. Does anyone know otherwise? https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231205122122.dfhhoaswsfscuhc3@quack3/ Is the bug likely to affect all architectures? I have a Pi bookworm (armhf) on 6.1.63-1, with 6.1.58-1 also installed. I can probably roll back to 6.1.54-1 if necessary. -- Joe
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-12-09 19:30 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2023-12-09 19:50 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Markus Schönhaber <debian-user@list-post.mks-mail.de> - 2023-12-09 20:00 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Alexis Grigoriou <alexis@nanoid.net> - 2023-12-09 20:10 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2023-12-09 20:20 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-09 20:30 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2023-12-09 21:00 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2023-12-09 21:00 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-12-09 22:20 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release "Niall O'Reilly" <niall+lists@no8.be> - 2023-12-10 17:00 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Gary Dale <gary@extremeground.com> - 2023-12-10 18:00 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-12-10 18:00 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2023-12-10 18:10 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-12-10 18:30 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-12-10 18:30 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2023-12-10 18:40 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-10 18:30 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Gary Dale <gary@extremeground.com> - 2023-12-10 19:00 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2023-12-10 19:50 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2023-12-10 20:40 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-12-10 20:50 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Gary Dale <gary@extremeground.com> - 2023-12-10 19:30 +0100
6.1.0-15/6.1.66-1 broken too? Kevin Price <kp@osnanet.de> - 2023-12-10 20:20 +0100
Re: 6.1.0-15/6.1.66-1 broken too? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-12-10 20:30 +0100
Re: 6.1.0-15/6.1.66-1 broken too? Kevin Price <kp@osnanet.de> - 2023-12-11 00:00 +0100
Re: 6.1.0-15/6.1.66-1 broken too? Kevin Price <kp@osnanet.de> - 2023-12-11 12:20 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-12-10 22:30 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-12-10 22:50 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Gary Dale <gary@extremeground.com> - 2023-12-11 17:40 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Махно <mindaugasceliesius@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 17:50 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Махно <mindaugasceliesius@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 17:50 +0100
Re: IMPORTANT: do NOT upgrade to new stable point release Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2023-12-11 17:50 +0100
csiph-web