Re: rhs time out error?

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: rhs time out error?
Date	Tue, 21 Nov 2023 23:50:02 +0100
Message-ID	<HCHJ8-74Py-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<HCGDo-74eE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <HCH6p-74Dn-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Tue Nov 21 22:41:50 2023
Old-Return-Path	<george@phare.normalesup.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-13.96 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -4.7
X-Ens-Nef-Client	129.199.129.80 ( name = phare.normalesup.org )
Reply-To	debian-user@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Wmf/F9oQ/CdtoBsT"
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Greylist	Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Tue, 21 Nov 2023 23:41:27 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailing-List	<debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/805517
List-ID	<debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZV0yFpdTP432jhwQ@phare.normalesup.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	47
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Tue, 21 Nov 2023 23:41:26 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<ZV0yFpdTP432jhwQ@phare.normalesup.org>
X-Original-References	<Pine.LNX.4.64.2311211634360.3579231@users.shellworld.net> <19574301466152985787@scdbackup.webframe.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.user:263763

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Thomas Schmitt (12023-11-21):
> Can it be that "rhs" is a typo and should rather be "rsh" ?

IMAP is the only protocol I know that officially has a
“preauthenticated” mode, where a user can run the server under their own
UID and interact with it through its standard input and output, going
directly into operation mode skipping the authentication phase.

That way, if a client supports it, you can connect to a IMAP server
through SSH and a key, for example.

It is a tragedy that not more authenticated protocols do not support the
same thing.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

rhs time out error? Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2023-11-21 22:40 +0100
  Re: rhs time out error? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2023-11-21 23:10 +0100
    Re: rhs time out error? Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2023-11-21 23:30 +0100
      Re: rhs time out error? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2023-11-22 08:50 +0100
        Re: rhs time out error? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2023-11-26 17:40 +0100
    Re: rhs time out error? Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2023-11-21 23:50 +0100

csiph-web