Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #258188

Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question thathasgoneunansweredseveraltimes.

From gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question thathasgoneunansweredseveraltimes.
Date 2023-05-12 21:30 +0200
Message-ID <GuGCJ-8qus-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <GuocN-8ePR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <GupVf-8fT9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Gux6p-8kH1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <Guyca-8ljm-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <GuG01-8pVi-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 5/12/23 14:45, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 12 May 2023 at 06:23:56 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> I'm confused. There is not anything wrong with this machine as a Server.
>> ALL of this muttering and bitching has been because bookworm clients did NOT
>> work. buster clients work great.
> 
> "work(s)" is such vague term. I guess working and non-working are references
> to
> 
>   > All of my bullseye machines are locked out, printer screen at
>   > localhost:631 is empty, and no printers can be found and added
> 
>> How many times do I have to say it is/was a CLIENT problem that only exists
>> for BOOKWORM clients.  The elephant in the room that most have ignored.
> 
> THe issue has been fully dealt with. In short:
> 
>    No local printers leads to an empty localhost:631 and 'lpstat -t'.
> 
> THere isn't any issue whatsoever. You seem very reluctant to incorporate this
> basic fact into your thinking. THe room is empty.
> 
> May we have 'lpstat -t' from a buster machine that is not bpi54?

This is buster, running a milling machine in the garage

gene@GO704:~$ lpstat -t
scheduler is running
no system default destination
device for Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote: 
implicitclass://Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote/
device for Brother_MFC_J6920DW: ipp://BRN30055C8A2DC8.local:631/ipp/print
device for Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote: 
implicitclass://Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote/
device for HLL2320D_coyote: implicitclass://HLL2320D_coyote/
device for MFCJ6920DW_tray_2_coyote: ///dev/null
Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote accepting requests since Fri 12 May 2023 
12:00:02 AM EDT
Brother_MFC_J6920DW accepting requests since Fri 12 May 2023 12:00:02 AM EDT
Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote accepting requests since Fri 12 May 2023 
12:00:02 AM EDT
HLL2320D_coyote accepting requests since Fri 12 May 2023 12:00:02 AM EDT
MFCJ6920DW_tray_2_coyote not accepting requests since Wed 03 May 2023 
12:00:02 AM EDT -
	reason unknown
printer Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote is idle.  enabled since Fri 12 
May 2023 12:00:02 AM EDT
printer Brother_MFC_J6920DW is idle.  enabled since Fri 12 May 2023 
12:00:02 AM EDT
printer Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote is idle.  enabled since Fri 12 May 
2023 12:00:02 AM EDT
printer HLL2320D_coyote is idle.  enabled since Fri 12 May 2023 12:00:02 
AM EDT
printer MFCJ6920DW_tray_2_coyote disabled since Wed 03 May 2023 12:00:02 
AM EDT -
	reason unknown

this is another gantry style machine:
gene@sixty40:~$ lpstat -t
scheduler is running
no system default destination
device for Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote: ///dev/null
device for Brother_MFC_J6920DW: ipp://BRN30055C8A2DC8.local:631/ipp/print
device for Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote: ///dev/null
Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote not accepting requests since Sun 23 Apr 
2023 12:00:03 AM EDT -
	reason unknown
Brother_MFC_J6920DW accepting requests since Fri 12 May 2023 12:00:14 AM EDT
Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote not accepting requests since Thu 20 Apr 2023 
12:00:03 AM EDT -
	reason unknown
printer Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote disabled since Sun 23 Apr 2023 
12:00:03 AM EDT -
	reason unknown
printer Brother_MFC_J6920DW is idle.  enabled since Fri 12 May 2023 
12:00:14 AM EDT
printer Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote disabled since Thu 20 Apr 2023 
12:00:03 AM EDT -
	reason unknown

and this is an rpi4b running a 1500 lb lathe:
pi@rpi4:~ $ lpstat -t
scheduler is running
no system default destination
device for Brother_HL-L2320D_series: 
usb://Brother/HL-L2320D%20series?serial=U63877H0N346913
device for Brother_MFC-J6920DW_photo: 
usb://Brother/MFC-J6920DW?serial=BROG5F229909
device for MFCJ6920DW: usb://Brother/MFC-J6920DW?serial=BROG5F229909
Brother_HL-L2320D_series accepting requests since Tue 09 May 2023 
05:23:01 PM EDT
Brother_MFC-J6920DW_photo accepting requests since Thu 30 Mar 2023 
09:16:43 AM EDT
MFCJ6920DW accepting requests since Sun 26 Mar 2023 03:30:13 PM EDT
printer Brother_HL-L2320D_series is idle.  enabled since Tue 09 May 2023 
05:23:01 PM EDT
printer Brother_MFC-J6920DW_photo is idle.  enabled since Thu 30 Mar 
2023 09:16:43 AM EDT
printer MFCJ6920DW is idle.  enabled since Sun 26 Mar 2023 03:30:13 PM EDT

there is a 2nd smaller lathe in a shed in the upper rear corner of the 
place that has been kept uptodate but is in the middle of a hardware 
update for linuxcnc, and its a suprise:

gene@TLM:~$ lpstat -t
scheduler is not running
no system default destination
lpstat: Bad file descriptor
lpstat: Bad file descriptor
lpstat: Bad file descriptor
lpstat: Bad file descriptor
lpstat: Bad file descriptor

but cups is not installed, its missing from .etc/init.d, rebooting 
didn't change.
machine updates and cups and friends installed:
gene@TLM:~$ lpstat -t
scheduler is running
no system default destination
device for Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote: 
implicitclass://Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote/
device for Brother_MFC_J6920DW: ipp://BRN30055C8A2DC8.local:631/ipp/print
device for Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote: 
implicitclass://Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote/
device for HLL2320D_coyote: implicitclass://HLL2320D_coyote/
device for MFCJ6920DW_tray_2_coyote: 
implicitclass://MFCJ6920DW_tray_2_coyote/
Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote accepting requests since Fri 12 May 2023 
03:21:26 PM EDT
Brother_MFC_J6920DW accepting requests since Fri 12 May 2023 03:20:24 PM EDT
Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote accepting requests since Fri 12 May 2023 
03:21:26 PM EDT
HLL2320D_coyote accepting requests since Fri 12 May 2023 03:21:26 PM EDT
MFCJ6920DW_tray_2_coyote accepting requests since Fri 12 May 2023 
03:21:26 PM EDT
printer Brother_HL_L2320D_series_coyote is idle.  enabled since Fri 12 
May 2023 03:21:26 PM EDT
printer Brother_MFC_J6920DW is idle.  enabled since Fri 12 May 2023 
03:20:24 PM EDT
printer Brother_MFC_J6920DW_coyote is idle.  enabled since Fri 12 May 
2023 03:21:26 PM EDT
printer HLL2320D_coyote is idle.  enabled since Fri 12 May 2023 03:21:26 
PM EDT
printer MFCJ6920DW_tray_2_coyote is idle.  enabled since Fri 12 May 2023 
03:21:26 PM EDT

all those running uptodate buster. opening and re-closing both paper 
trays on the 6920 fixed that error

Cheers, Gene Heskett.
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
  - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/>

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered several times. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-01 01:10 +0200
  Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered several times. Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2023-05-01 02:20 +0200
    Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered several  times. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-01 09:40 +0200
      Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered several  times. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 15:00 +0200
        Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered  severaltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-01 15:50 +0200
          Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered  severaltimes. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 16:10 +0200
            Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered  severaltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 16:40 +0200
            Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-01 17:00 +0200
              Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 17:40 +0200
          Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered  severaltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 16:20 +0200
            Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-01 17:10 +0200
              Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-01 17:20 +0200
              Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 17:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-01 17:50 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 18:40 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-01 19:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 19:40 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-02 00:00 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-02 01:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-01 19:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 20:40 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-02 00:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone  unansweredseveraltimes. debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2023-05-01 22:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 23:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-02 01:00 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has goneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-02 00:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has goneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-02 01:00 +0200
          Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered severaltimes. Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-05-01 16:20 +0200
        Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered  severaltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-01 17:00 +0200
  Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered several  times. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 06:30 +0200
  Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered several  times. john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2023-05-01 09:40 +0200
    Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered several  times. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-01 13:50 +0200
      Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered several  times. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-01 15:00 +0200
        Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered several  times. zithro <slack@rabbit.lu> - 2023-05-04 21:50 +0200
          Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered  severaltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-04 22:00 +0200
            Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unanswered  severaltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-05 16:10 +0200
              Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-05 17:50 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-05 19:50 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-05 22:40 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-06 01:00 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-06 03:40 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Alex King <alex@king.net.nz> - 2023-05-07 01:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone  unansweredseveraltimes. David <curmudgeon@telaman.net.au> - 2023-05-07 02:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Byung-Hee HWANG <soyeomul@doraji.xyz> - 2023-05-07 03:40 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2023-05-07 13:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-07 17:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-07 18:50 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-08 06:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-08 13:50 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-08 19:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-09 00:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-09 10:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-05-09 13:20 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-09 22:50 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-10 14:20 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-10 16:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-05-10 16:50 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-10 17:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-10 19:20 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-10 20:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-10 22:00 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-11 13:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-11 18:30 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-10 22:10 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone  unansweredseveraltimes. debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2023-05-10 22:20 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-11 13:10 +0200
                SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that has gone  unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-11 18:10 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that has gone  unansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-11 21:20 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that has gone  unansweredseveraltimes. Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2023-05-12 00:00 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that has gone  unansweredseveraltimes. Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-05-12 00:30 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that has gone  unansweredseveraltimes. Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2023-05-12 01:50 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that has  goneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-12 03:40 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that has  goneunansweredseveraltimes. Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2023-05-12 11:20 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that  hasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-12 12:30 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that  hasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-05-12 13:30 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that  hasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2023-05-12 13:50 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question  thathasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-12 18:20 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that  hasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-12 12:30 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that  hasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2023-05-12 13:50 +0200
                :Re: repeat of previous question thathasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-12 18:10 +0200
                Re: :Re: repeat of previous question  thathasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2023-05-12 23:30 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that  hasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-12 20:50 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question  thathasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-12 21:30 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question  thathasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-13 13:20 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous  questionthathasgoneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-13 17:10 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that has  goneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-12 03:30 +0200
                Re: SOLVED:Re: repeat of previous question that has  goneunansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-12 03:20 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2023-05-07 19:40 +0200
                Re: repeat of previous question that has gone unansweredseveraltimes. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-05-08 07:10 +0200

csiph-web