(suspend && lock screen) vs (lock screen && suspend)

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	(suspend && lock screen) vs (lock screen && suspend)
Date	Thu, 12 May 2022 15:10:01 +0200
Message-ID	<EmgJP-eYY0-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<EmgJP-eYY0-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Thu May 12 13:06:50 2022
Old-Return-Path	<gldu-debian-user-2@m.gmane-mx.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-1.572 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=1.63, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -4.6
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0.3
Content-Language	en-GB
X-No-Archive	yes
X-Mailing-List	<debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/789027
List-ID	<debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/t5j0om$f1q$1@ciao.gmane.io
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	38
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Thu, 12 May 2022 14:06:24 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<t5j0om$f1q$1@ciao.gmane.io>
X-Original-References	<t5ggf0$um6$1@dont-email.me>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.user:248120

Show key headers only | View raw

[Originally posted to comp.unix.shell but no replies there]

$ uname -a
Linux e130 5.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 5.16.12-1~bpo11+1 
(2022-03-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ cat /etc/debian_version
11.2




Hi,

Not sure if this just a command invocation problem or there are other 
issues at hand (say, power management, etc) but... I have a script that 
binds to 'CTRL + SHIFT + S':


$ cat opt/bin/lock-suspend
#!/bin/sh
systemctl suspend && mate-screensaver-command  -l


This one seems to work, however I would have thought that the logical 
sequence would be:

mate-screensaver-command  -l && systemctl suspend

that is, a) lock screen; b) suspend; c) resume with lock screen on.

Instead, if I use the latter syntax, upon resuming, there is a 10 second 
delay before locking the screen, which is not ideal for obvious privacy 
reasons.

Any input on that?

-- 
Ottavio Caruso

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

(suspend && lock screen) vs (lock screen && suspend) Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> - 2022-05-12 15:10 +0200
  Re: (suspend && lock screen) vs (lock screen && suspend) Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-05-12 15:40 +0200
    Re: (suspend && lock screen) vs (lock screen && suspend) Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> - 2022-05-12 18:40 +0200
      Re: (suspend && lock screen) vs (lock screen && suspend) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-05-12 19:20 +0200
        Re: (suspend && lock screen) vs (lock screen && suspend) Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> - 2022-05-13 12:30 +0200

csiph-web