Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #247898
| From | Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? |
| Date | 2022-05-04 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EjnHP-daPI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EiGjw-cIS9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <EiIuZ-cKcg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <EiIOl-cKyg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EjdS9-d4n7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Anders Andersson (12022-05-04): > On this note, I've always found it annoying that debian (and likely > others) don't put /sbin in the normal user's $PATH. A lot of the tools > there have uses other than modifying the system. I have to unpack Zip files rather often, I use unzip in command-line. It has become an automatism: “unz<tab><space>/tmp/...<tab>”. Recently, initrd-tools complained that zstd was not installed, so I installed it. The next time I had a Zip file to unpack, I typed “unz<tab>” and was confused that it did not work: “unz<tab>” had become ambiguous between “unzip(sfx)” and “unzstd”. Every program in the search path clutters the namespace and makes the shell completion less efficient. When a program is useful for a normal user once every 36th of the month, I would rather not have it in the default search path: typing “/sb<tab>” then is cheap enough for the benefit of gaining a few keystrokes for commands I use many times a day. YMMV. Regards, -- Nicolas George
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2022-05-02 17:40 +0200
Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? Lucio Crusca <lucio@sulweb.org> - 2022-05-02 17:50 +0200
Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-05-02 17:50 +0200
Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-05-02 18:00 +0200
Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2022-05-02 20:00 +0200
Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-05-02 20:20 +0200
Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2022-05-04 05:30 +0200
Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? tomas@tuxteam.de - 2022-05-04 07:40 +0200
Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2022-05-04 15:10 +0200
Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-05-04 15:40 +0200
Re: Odd reproducible problem - but is it a bug? Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2022-05-04 16:00 +0200
csiph-web