Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #242896

Re: Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc)

From Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc)
Date 2021-12-10 12:50 +0100
Message-ID <DsMzw-5Ul-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Deqfw-4JP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <Deqpb-4Nv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DeqIx-4Ux-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Du, 31 oct 21, 17:37:10, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > This is because GNU releases their documentation under a different license
> > than their source code.  And Debian considers the GNU documentation
> > license to be non-free (rightly so, because it prohibits distributing
> > modified versions).
> 
> FWIW, it's not nearly as clear cut as you make it sound, because it does
> not prevent distribution of all modified versions.
> 
> It does require one particular section to be kept unmodified (IIRC it's
> the section that promotes the FSF philosophy), but the bulk is Free in
> the usual sense of allowing redistribution of modified versions.

As far as I understand[1] further modifications can add other invariant 
sections as well and humans have demonstrated a remarkable capacity of 
abusing such loopholes.
 
> I find this state of affair rather sad and am disappointed by both
> Debian and the FSF for not finding a compromise.  It ends up promoting
> the use of the non-free repository, which I think neither project wants.

At the very least Debian could split non-free into sections or add more 
areas (non-free firmware being another obvious candidate for splitting 
out).

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/GFDLPositionStatement

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Man pages for gcc "Paul M. Foster" <paulf@quillandmouse.com> - 2021-10-31 22:10 +0100
  Re: Man pages for gcc Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-10-31 22:20 +0100
    Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-10-31 22:40 +0100
      Re: Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-12-10 12:50 +0100
        Re: Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-12-10 18:20 +0100
          Re: Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-12-10 18:40 +0100
          Re: Debian and FSF docs Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-12-10 19:10 +0100
            Re: Debian and FSF docs Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-12-11 01:30 +0100
              Re: Debian and FSF docs Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-12-11 01:50 +0100
                Re: Debian and FSF docs Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-12-11 05:20 +0100
                Re: Debian and FSF docs <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-12-11 08:50 +0100
                Re: Debian and FSF docs Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-12-11 16:50 +0100
                Re: Debian and FSF docs tomas@tuxteam.de - 2021-12-11 19:10 +0100
  Re: Man pages for gcc Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-10-31 22:30 +0100
    Re: Man pages for gcc Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-10-31 23:10 +0100
      Re: Man pages for gcc Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-11-01 16:10 +0100
  Re: Man pages for gcc Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-10-31 22:40 +0100
  Re: Man pages for gcc Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> - 2021-11-07 08:10 +0100
    Re: Man pages for gcc Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-12-10 12:30 +0100

csiph-web