Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #242896
| From | Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc) |
| Date | 2021-12-10 12:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DsMzw-5Ul-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Deqfw-4JP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <Deqpb-4Nv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DeqIx-4Ux-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Du, 31 oct 21, 17:37:10, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > This is because GNU releases their documentation under a different license > > than their source code. And Debian considers the GNU documentation > > license to be non-free (rightly so, because it prohibits distributing > > modified versions). > > FWIW, it's not nearly as clear cut as you make it sound, because it does > not prevent distribution of all modified versions. > > It does require one particular section to be kept unmodified (IIRC it's > the section that promotes the FSF philosophy), but the bulk is Free in > the usual sense of allowing redistribution of modified versions. As far as I understand[1] further modifications can add other invariant sections as well and humans have demonstrated a remarkable capacity of abusing such loopholes. > I find this state of affair rather sad and am disappointed by both > Debian and the FSF for not finding a compromise. It ends up promoting > the use of the non-free repository, which I think neither project wants. At the very least Debian could split non-free into sections or add more areas (non-free firmware being another obvious candidate for splitting out). [1] https://wiki.debian.org/GFDLPositionStatement Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Man pages for gcc "Paul M. Foster" <paulf@quillandmouse.com> - 2021-10-31 22:10 +0100
Re: Man pages for gcc Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-10-31 22:20 +0100
Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-10-31 22:40 +0100
Re: Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-12-10 12:50 +0100
Re: Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-12-10 18:20 +0100
Re: Debian and FSF docs (was: Man pages for gcc) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-12-10 18:40 +0100
Re: Debian and FSF docs Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-12-10 19:10 +0100
Re: Debian and FSF docs Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-12-11 01:30 +0100
Re: Debian and FSF docs Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-12-11 01:50 +0100
Re: Debian and FSF docs Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-12-11 05:20 +0100
Re: Debian and FSF docs <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-12-11 08:50 +0100
Re: Debian and FSF docs Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-12-11 16:50 +0100
Re: Debian and FSF docs tomas@tuxteam.de - 2021-12-11 19:10 +0100
Re: Man pages for gcc Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-10-31 22:30 +0100
Re: Man pages for gcc Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-10-31 23:10 +0100
Re: Man pages for gcc Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-11-01 16:10 +0100
Re: Man pages for gcc Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-10-31 22:40 +0100
Re: Man pages for gcc Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> - 2021-11-07 08:10 +0100
Re: Man pages for gcc Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-12-10 12:30 +0100
csiph-web