Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #245115
| From | Maurizio Caloro <maurizio@caloro.ch> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | let me understand this - packages delay |
| Date | 2022-02-08 22:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DOG41-tQF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, please this is a friendly request and a discussion starter keep asking myself why there are such big version differences between the publisher and the packages. -Buster 10.11- ii postfix 3.4.14-0+deb10u1, was announced June 27, 2020 ii dovecot-core 1:2.3.4.1-5+deb10u6, was announced Feb 5, 2019 ii spamassassin 3.4.2-1+deb10u3, was announced Sep 16, 2018 ii openssl 1.1.1d-0+deb10u7, was announced Sep 11, 2018 I see that Bullseye would have newer releases (sorry, i'dont check this now) but can this really only be renewed with Package mechanismus, so i need to run a global upgrade of the OS? every system that i run will be installed with Debian, and iam happy with it! i would appreciate it if packages were kept reasonably up-to-date. certainly not extreme that you should follow up on every patch or release, but would still be a bit more up-to-date without having to upgrade an entire OS. please this should be a friendly discussion/review, thanks -- if your tires profile expire, you have also put the hole car to trash?
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
let me understand this - packages delay Maurizio Caloro <maurizio@caloro.ch> - 2022-02-08 22:20 +0100 Re: let me understand this - packages delay Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-02-08 22:40 +0100 Re: let me understand this - packages delay "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-02-09 00:50 +0100
csiph-web