Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #245062

Re: One-user system.

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri 04 Feb 2022 at 21:41:24 (-0800), peter@easthope.ca wrote:
>     From: David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
>     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 11:08:28 -0600
> > But hey, it could be quite exciting, like carrying a cocked
> > revolver tucked into your waistband. One casual typo, one
> > misplaced space, and you can blow away a whole disk.
> 
> System destruction is exasperating.  Lapse in security is another 
> risk; possibly more serious.  My knowledge is meagre and this was 
> helpful.
> 
> The Illusion of Privacy/Security using ANY Web-browser
> https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic.php?t=1583

I didn't get far down the first page, and certainly not through all 53
posts, before reaching:

 "Think a different Operating System provides any greater security?
  privacy? because under it you run as a User with limited privileges?
  Well, I booted into Linux Mint Ulyana. Iron web-browser required that
  I provide a password to run it. But once it was running,
  Atttachments>Add gave me access to my mounted hard-drive.. And worse
  than under Puppies, Linux Mint Ulyana would automatically mount
  partitions which weren't already mounted. :shock:"

There's no explanation of what "password" was given, so any
conclusions are moot. But if the article is supposed to blow a hole
in Puppy's securtiy model, well, so what.

And then I read the fourth post, which seemed to be using umask and
chmod to configure what Debian gives you already.

> Mitigation of risk.
> https://wikka.puppylinux.com/spot

I don't know what "spot" and "fido" are all about, unless to recreate
the conventional concept of Ordinary Users.

> Rather than reinvent the wheel, I should use a product of extensive 
> development.
> http://wikka.puppylinux.com/DebianDog
> https://github.com/DebianDog/

That depends on whether you trust the system's developers. My trust
in Debian has been forged through 25 years of use, and by reading
technical reviews over the years by others.

Cheers,
David.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: One user system. john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2022-02-01 19:30 +0100
  Re: One user system. Bijan Soleymani <bijan@psq.com> - 2022-02-01 20:00 +0100
  Re: One user system. peter@easthope.ca - 2022-02-01 21:10 +0100
    Re: One user system. Bijan Soleymani <bijan@psq.com> - 2022-02-01 21:10 +0100
      Re: One user system. Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2022-02-01 22:00 +0100
      Re: One user system. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2022-02-02 00:10 +0100
      Re: One user system. Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2022-02-02 02:10 +0100
        Re: One user system. Bijan Soleymani <bijan@psq.com> - 2022-02-02 06:30 +0100
    Re: One user system. "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-02-01 21:10 +0100
    Re: One user system. john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2022-02-02 08:10 +0100
      Re: One user system. peter@easthope.ca - 2022-02-02 18:20 +0100
    Re: One user system. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-02-02 18:10 +0100
      Re: One-user system.  Was "One user system." peter@easthope.ca - 2022-02-04 20:00 +0100
        [SOLVED] Re: One-user system.  peter@easthope.ca - 2022-02-05 07:10 +0100
          Re: One-user system. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-02-07 03:10 +0100
        Re: One-user system.  Was "One user system." Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 12:10 +0100
          Re: One-user system.  Was "One user system." rhkramer@gmail.com - 2022-02-10 17:20 +0100
            Re: One-user system.  Was "One user system." Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2022-02-10 21:30 +0100
              Re: One-user system.  Was "One user system." David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-02-13 18:10 +0100
            Re: One-user system.  Was "One user system." Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-02-11 20:20 +0100
      [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. peter@easthope.ca - 2022-05-06 19:10 +0200
        Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-05-06 19:20 +0200
          Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-05-06 19:30 +0200
          Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. Eike Lantzsch ZP6CGE <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2022-05-06 19:40 +0200
            Re: [OT] Re: One-user system. Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2022-05-06 19:40 +0200
          Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2022-05-06 20:30 +0200
            Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-05-06 20:50 +0200
            Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2022-05-06 20:50 +0200
            Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. Dennis Wicks <wix@mgssub.com> - 2022-05-06 21:00 +0200
        Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2022-05-06 22:20 +0200
          Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2022-05-07 04:20 +0200
            Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. Marc Shapiro <marcnshap@gmail.com> - 2022-05-12 08:40 +0200
              Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-05-12 17:40 +0200
        Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2022-05-06 22:20 +0200
        Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-05-09 04:00 +0200
          Re: [SOLVED] Re: One-user system. peter@easthope.ca - 2022-06-28 15:50 +0200

csiph-web