Re: inode issue with cifs

From	Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: inode issue with cifs
Date	2022-01-22 18:30 +0100
Message-ID	<DIsn7-61r-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<DIqEG-4W6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <DIr7I-5ly-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DIrKr-5yK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <DIrKr-5yK-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DIrU8-5Cb-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Little Bill wrote: 
> I dont want to use nfs. And considering the inode appears correct
> initially. It appears there is a bug somewhere.
> 
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022, 11:28 AM Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> wrote:
> 
> > Little Bill wrote:
> > > Provided the mount?  This inode issue doesn't occur on Debian 8 and nfs.
> > To
> > > the same nas and content
> >
> > Then why don't you try it with NFS and see if two networked
> > filesystems give the same results or different results?

And doing what i suggested would tell you where the bug is.

-dsr-

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

inode issue with cifs Little Bill <littlebill2121@gmail.com> - 2022-01-22 16:40 +0100
  Re: inode issue with cifs Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-22 17:10 +0100
    Re: inode issue with cifs Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-22 17:50 +0100
      Re: inode issue with cifs Little Bill <littlebill2121@gmail.com> - 2022-01-22 18:00 +0100
        Re: inode issue with cifs Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-22 18:30 +0100

csiph-web