Re: imagemagick policy setting

From	<tomas@tuxteam.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: imagemagick policy setting
Date	2022-01-17 13:10 +0100
Message-ID	<DGyZH-8tP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <DGonE-1p6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DGrbP-3cr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DGrvb-3y1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DGs7T-3Kg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <DGywG-848-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:29:39PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> local10 wrote:
> 
> > Those who suggest that you use google are not your friends. You can start
> > here:
> > 
> > 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Google
> > 
> > 2. https://nomoregoogle.com/
> > 
> 
> Oh come on, it is a synonym for a search engine. Of course it is a sh*t
> business model they have towards customers/users, but the search engine is
> really good.
> I've tried duckduckgo for some time, but it is not comparable and it is also
> understandable. I agree it would be better we use alternatives, but in
> terms of quality, there are none.

We have had this discussion already. The way you put it in absolute
terms is simply wrong.

Google has much more context on your query, because they track you.
You'll have to learn to provide DDG with that missing context, then the
results are comparable. You get to learn a bit about search in the
process :-)

I've actually switched from Google to DDG (roughly six years ago). From
time to time (about twice a year) I still resort to Google, especially
when I don't understand why I'm not getting results I expect.

Cheers
-- 
t

Thread

imagemagick policy setting Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> - 2022-01-17 00:40 +0100
  Re: imagemagick policy setting deloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org> - 2022-01-17 01:50 +0100
    Re: imagemagick policy setting Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> - 2022-01-17 02:50 +0100
    Re: imagemagick policy setting local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-17 04:50 +0100
      Re: imagemagick policy setting Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> - 2022-01-17 05:10 +0100
        Re: imagemagick policy setting local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2022-01-17 05:50 +0100
          Re: imagemagick policy setting deloptes <emanoil.kotsev@deloptes.org> - 2022-01-17 12:40 +0100
            Re: imagemagick policy setting <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-01-17 13:10 +0100
            Re: imagemagick policy setting Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2022-01-17 18:10 +0100

csiph-web