Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #236165

Re: SOLVED: Is invoking the -locker option of xautolock to run a script known? Could I be helped with an xautolock code line please?

From "Susmita/Rajib" <bkpsusmitaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: SOLVED: Is invoking the -locker option of xautolock to run a script known? Could I be helped with an xautolock code line please?
Date 2021-06-16 17:30 +0200
Message-ID <CqFEm-4qW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CpzAZ-54L-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


My dear illustrious List leaders and senior members.

I wanted to know if the line [quote] xautolock -time 1 -locker
"./ssvr.sh" [/quote] is creating forks/multiple instances of the bash
shell running the ssvr.sh script.

If it does, how to eradicate the fork? How to manipulate the line?
Would the line  xautolock -time 1 -locker "xset dpms force off" create
similar forks / multiple instances of the bash shell? Usurp more
memory space.

I have a hunch that either the script file ./ssvr.sh, run from
terminal, or the xautolock line with direct xset dpms ... won't create
forks, but the xautolock line with ./ssvr.sh will do.

Please feel free to advise.

Best.

Rajib
Etc.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

SOLVED: Is invoking the -locker option of xautolock to run a script  known? Could I be helped with an xautolock code line please? "Susmita/Rajib" <bkpsusmitaa@gmail.com> - 2021-06-13 16:50 +0200
  Re: SOLVED: Is invoking the -locker option of xautolock to run a  script known? Could I be helped with an xautolock code line please? "Susmita/Rajib" <bkpsusmitaa@gmail.com> - 2021-06-16 17:30 +0200

csiph-web