Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.

From	Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax.
Date	2021-05-05 10:30 +0200
Message-ID	<Cbl4R-5hj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<CbjPr-4BO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CbkBP-4RU-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

On Wed, 05 May 2021 09:51:59 +0200
"Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> wrote:

(...)
> The reason for not eternally offering videos for download is in the
> legal framework of german state TV. (In german:
> "Rundfunkstaatsvertrag", now "Medienstaatsvertrag".)
> 
> State run TV collects mandatory fees from all households for the purpose
> of broadcasting radio and TV. When the internet became important for
> publishing, the private german newspaper publishers and TV stations
> objected that the state run TV used those fees for financing a strong
> web appearance. The compromise, which is now law, was the rule that
> videos and audio are publicly available only for a limited time.
>   https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96ffentlich-rechtlicher_Rundfunk#Engagement_im_Internet
>   https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depublizieren
> 

I know, but that does not really explain why they bother to block
third-party uploads on yt, there are lots of material there hwre they
apparently don't care, like these two quickly collected examples:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhGC1O0gZNI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnH10TfhkOQ

> We had cases of self-censoring which led to depublication. I remember
> the song "Meine Oma ist 'ne alte Umweltsau" (= "My granny is an old
> environmental hog"), sung by a children choir and produced by TV station
> WDR in 2019. That video was retracted after conservative politicians
> complained about the insult towards their main voter group.
>   https://www.sueddeutsche.de/medien/wdr-umweltsau-kinderchor-satire-1.4738637

Yeah, I remember that one, and particularly its aftermath; is there an
English word for "Realsatire"? Priceless! :-)

Still seems to be available on yt, though.

> 
> But i really do not see any such censoring with the video about
> environmental problems with electrical cars. It was aired and then
> available for two months. Business as good or bad as ever.

Sure, I agree about that. For some reason they care enough to make yt
block the video for Germany, but that has nothing to do with
"censorship". It think it might even be possible that they found enough
factual errors in the film that they prefer to withdraw it.

Regards

Michael

.-.. .. ...- .   .-.. --- -. --.   .- -. -..   .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-.

Vulcans never bluff.
		-- Spock, "The Doomsday Machine", stardate 4202.1

Thread

HTML syntax. peter@easthope.ca - 2021-05-03 18:10 +0200
  Re: HTML syntax. Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2021-05-03 18:40 +0200
  Re: HTML syntax. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-05-03 18:40 +0200
  Re: HTML syntax. Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-05-03 18:40 +0200
  Re: HTML syntax. deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2021-05-03 21:00 +0200
    Re: HTML syntax. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-05-03 21:50 +0200
      Re: HTML syntax. deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2021-05-04 00:00 +0200
        Re: HTML syntax. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-05-04 09:10 +0200
          Re: HTML syntax. deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2021-05-04 10:40 +0200
            Re: HTML syntax. Weaver <weaver@riseup.net> - 2021-05-04 10:50 +0200
              Re: HTML syntax. deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2021-05-04 16:40 +0200
            [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-05-04 11:20 +0200
              Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. Felmon Davis <moelmoel2714@gmail.com> - 2021-05-04 16:00 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2021-05-04 16:30 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. Felmon Davis <moelmoel2714@gmail.com> - 2021-05-04 18:40 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. Felmon Davis <moelmoel2714@gmail.com> - 2021-05-05 01:10 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2021-05-05 09:10 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2021-05-05 09:30 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2021-05-05 09:50 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-05-05 10:00 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2021-05-05 10:20 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-05-05 10:40 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2021-05-05 13:50 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2021-05-05 10:30 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-05-05 11:30 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-05-05 13:20 +0200
                Re: [Off topic] videos of german state TV, was Re: HTML syntax. deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2021-05-05 09:20 +0200
  Re: HTML syntax. rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-05-04 19:30 +0200
    Re: HTML syntax. peter@easthope.ca - 2021-05-07 01:10 +0200
      Re: HTML syntax. Weaver <weaver@riseup.net> - 2021-05-07 01:30 +0200

csiph-web