Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #239970
| From | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso |
| Date | 2021-09-14 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CXgFA-4JL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <CXeX7-3xX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CXfgu-3Gl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 01:56:23PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > If a DVD image is too big to download in and of itself, there are > > tools like jigdo which will allow you to build the media images from > > individual packages > > Jigdo does not support the composition of new images. > The .template file inflates to the size of the ISO image for which it > was produced. This inflated file contains holes into which jigdo-lite > inserts .deb packages which it downloads according to the .jigdo file. > No, but it does allow you to get a DVD sized image over a number of days or a much longer period by connecting as/when you can or taking the opportunity of a higher bandwidth connection somewhere as and when available. I have good internet bandwidth here so not a problem - but the fact that jigdo is restartable at any point is a plus if you're obliged to use it. All best, Andy C. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Another idea to get a smaller XFCE capable image: > > One could use the "modifying" use case of xorriso to strip down a > DVD sized image by removing packages which will surely not be needed. > > xorriso -indev debian-11.0.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso \ > -outdev my_new_debian_11.iso \ > -rm ...paths.in.the.ISO... -- \ > -boot_image any replay > > (Note that this time it is "replay" not "keep" with the -boot_image > command. "keep" works only with multi-session, which always enlarges ISOs > even if files get removed/hidden.) > > Above method would avoid the need to download dozens of .deb files which > are needed for XFCE. But it imposes the need to download a whole DVD sized > image. > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Sriram <vsram01@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-14 08:10 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-09-14 08:50 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Sriram <vsram01@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-14 11:50 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-09-14 12:30 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Sriram <vsram01@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-14 12:40 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Sriram <vsram01@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-16 07:30 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 09:50 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-09-16 11:50 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-16 15:10 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 00:50 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-17 01:20 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-14 16:10 +0200
Re: was: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2021-09-14 17:50 +0200
mdadm RAID and the Bullseye installer Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-09-14 19:00 +0200
Re: mdadm RAID and the Bullseye installer Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2021-09-14 19:30 +0200
Re: was: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-09-14 19:20 +0200
Re: was: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2021-09-14 19:50 +0200
Re: was: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-09-15 09:20 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-09-14 16:40 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-09-14 09:10 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-09-14 13:30 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-09-14 16:00 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-14 20:00 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-09-15 09:30 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-15 16:00 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 06:10 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-09-14 13:40 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-09-14 14:00 +0200
Re: support for xfce in bullseye minimal netinst iso "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-09-14 15:30 +0200
csiph-web