Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #239744

Re: sources.list 's security line

From Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: sources.list 's security line
Date 2021-09-06 15:20 +0200
Message-ID <CUmHv-7ou-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CUjzY-5az-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <CUkml-5Ie-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CUm4N-6P9-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 08:34:44 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 06 Sep 2021 at 06:53:25 -0300, riveravaldez wrote:
> > > after reading the various sources of documentation (handbook,
> > > wiki, FAQs, Release Notes, etc.) I think I'm finding myself with
> > > kinda four options for the security line in /etc/apt/sources.list
> > > Those being:
> > > 
> > > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main
> > > 
> > > deb http://security.debian.org bullseye-security main
> > > 
> > > deb https://deb.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main
> > > 
> > > deb http://security.debian.org testing/updates main
> > 
> > The first and the third are legitimate lines. I am unsure about the
> > other two, particulary the last one.
> 
> The fourth one is definitely wrong, because the repository changed
> from foo/updates to foo-security during the bullseye release cycle.
> 
> The second one *appears* to work, or at least, I get something that
> doesn't look totally wrong when I paste http://security.debian.org
> and bullseye-security into a browser's URL bar, and then put /dists/
> in between them.
> 
> But that doesn't make it a good idea to use the second one, because
> who knows whether it will continue working into the future.

It is always a good idea to go with the flow in cases like this.
 
> Also, there's the wee little fact that testing is no longer a synonym
> for bullseye, and therefore even if the fourth one *did* work, it
> wouldn't be equivalent to the other three.
> 
> So, that really leaves us with two:
> 
>   deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main
> 
>   deb https://deb.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main
> 
> The difference between these two is which mirror network (and really,
> which mirroring *paradigm*) is used.  The first one uses a DNS round
> robin that points to a rather limited set of servers, easily overloaded
> when there's a huge security update (e.g. a kernel).
> 
> The other one uses the deb.debian.org infrastructure with its fancy DNS
> SRV records and so on.  See <http://deb.debian.org/> for details.
> 
> I'm not sure when debian-security got added to the deb.debian.org
> infrastructure; it's pretty new, I think.  Thus, a lot of people may
> not even know that it's an option.

I have

  deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main

but acknowledge that the Release Notes for bullseye has

  deb https://deb.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main

IMO, either is suitable, but there is an opinion that the second is to
be preferred because many users expect to be given https transport to
use.

-- 
Brian.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

sources.list 's security line riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 12:00 +0200
  Re: sources.list 's security line "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-09-06 12:10 +0200
    Re: sources.list 's security line Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-06 12:30 +0200
      Re: sources.list 's security line Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-06 13:40 +0200
  Re: sources.list 's security line Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-06 12:50 +0200
    Re: sources.list 's security line Toni Mas Soler <antomassol@protonmail.com> - 2021-09-06 13:00 +0200
    Re: sources.list 's security line Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-09-06 14:40 +0200
      Re: sources.list 's security line Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-06 15:20 +0200
      Re: sources.list 's security line Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-06 19:10 +0200
  Re: sources.list 's security line Steve Dondley <s@dondley.com> - 2021-09-06 19:10 +0200
    Re: sources.list 's security line Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2021-09-07 01:30 +0200
      Re: sources.list 's security line "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-09-07 09:30 +0200
      Re: sources.list 's security line Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2021-09-08 17:00 +0200
        Re: sources.list 's security line Ulf Volmer <u.volmer@u-v.de> - 2021-09-08 20:50 +0200
          Re: sources.list 's security line Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-09-08 21:20 +0200
            Re: sources.list 's security line Ulf Volmer <u.volmer@u-v.de> - 2021-09-08 21:40 +0200

csiph-web