Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #239623

Re: gcc-10: options order important?

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 14:10 +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 12:24 +0200, Piotr A. Dybczyński wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > in contrary to previous versions, now in Debian 11 with gcc-10:
> > 
> > gcc aa.c -lm -o aa           works, but
> > 
> > gcc -lm aa.c -o aa           does not work, saying: 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > It seems that an option -lm cannot be placed in an arbitrary place which I used to
> > do. Is this intentional ?
> 
> I found this too, I just modified my Makefiles to have libraries after
> input files.
> 
> A man page a found online [1] says linking happens as Greg described, 
> and this is true looking at a 6 year old copy of that page on
> archive.org. So seems strange that for many years my Makefiles have
> worked with Libraries specified before inputs that use them.

Correction... 'for many years my Makefiles have worked with Libraries
specified _after_ inputs that use them'

-- 
Tixy

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

gcc-10: options order important? "Piotr A. Dybczyński" <piotr@dybczynski.pl> - 2021-09-03 12:30 +0200
  Re: gcc-10: options order important? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-09-03 13:40 +0200
  Re: gcc-10: options order important? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2021-09-03 15:20 +0200
    Re: gcc-10: options order important? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-09-03 19:00 +0200
      Re: gcc-10: options order important? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-03 20:50 +0200
  Re: gcc-10: options order important? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2021-09-03 15:20 +0200
  Re: gcc-10: options order important? Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2021-09-03 21:00 +0200

csiph-web