Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #239667

Re: which vs. type, and recursion?

From Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: which vs. type, and recursion?
Date 2021-09-04 12:00 +0200
Message-ID <CTACR-1p8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CTA9P-1dG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <CTA9P-1dG-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/09/21 9:26 pm, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 04 Sep 2021 at 21:21:38 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
> 
>> Greg Wooledge pointed out in another thread that 'type' is often better than
>> 'which' for finding out what kind of command you're about to run, and where
>> it comes from.
>> 
>> A quick test, however, threw up another issue:
>> 
>> richard@zircon:~$ type ls
>> ls is aliased to `ls --color=auto'
>> 
>> Great, so it's an alias. But what is the underlying ls? How do I find out? I
>> did find out, by unaliasing ls and trying again, which showed that it's an
>> actual executable, /usr/bin/ls, and not a shell builtin.
>> 
>> But is there an easier/better way? Can 'type' be asked to recursively decode
>> aliases?
>> 
>> I looked at the relevant section of bash(1) (when I eventually found it),
>> but was not particularly enlightened.
> 
> Use 'help type' and try 'type -a ls'.
> 

That ('help type') is much more readable than bash(1), thanks. I think I 
might have known about 'help', but had forgotten ...

Cheers,
Richard

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: which vs. type, and recursion? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-09-04 11:30 +0200
  Re: which vs. type, and recursion? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2021-09-04 12:00 +0200

csiph-web