Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #239664

which vs. type, and recursion?

Show all headers | View raw

Greg Wooledge pointed out in another thread that 'type' is often better 
than 'which' for finding out what kind of command you're about to run, 
and where it comes from.

A quick test, however, threw up another issue:

richard@zircon:~$ type ls
ls is aliased to `ls --color=auto'

Great, so it's an alias. But what is the underlying ls? How do I find 
out? I did find out, by unaliasing ls and trying again, which showed 
that it's an actual executable, /usr/bin/ls, and not a shell builtin.

But is there an easier/better way? Can 'type' be asked to recursively 
decode aliases?

I looked at the relevant section of bash(1) (when I eventually found 
it), but was not particularly enlightened.

Cheers,
Richard

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

which vs. type, and recursion? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2021-09-04 11:30 +0200
  Re: which vs. type, and recursion? john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2021-09-04 11:30 +0200

csiph-web