Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #239091

Re: nvme SSD and poor performance

Path csiph.com!news.neodome.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: nvme SSD and poor performance
Date Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:30:01 +0200
Message-ID <COfz3-R4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CN4cG-3pJ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <CN7tU-5Jm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CN7WV-68W-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 20 16:22:28 2021
Old-Return-Path <piorunz@gmx.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-5.501 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5
X-Ui-Sender-Class 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID V03:K1:pz4KDzLZCJbNewpfawXfQkLINIOX+FDoFs9ulcqTWrBNlbQ8fip uT1ALnOa0a9JITIP5pgRhpHFbfaxrH4Vi2BZyHnrV3Og/4oz2V0cZcR3iSHM+9nOkXp6dnJ cy5xOwDIdOvVIkyeadKZr1p07zMITDyqRKIVFoBUJDvwfrBih2qQ9UKDFiEGYfdviX0ePjP tjQYD9dfAiIoLVUbpGhrg==
X-Ui-Out-Filterresults notjunk:1;V03:K0:MrQVj0RJkyc=:qIVnpluQt3hIkyDqGLHifC 1ZYT01LmyDAwjn0WAkzpzUzW/+oHC4fTEEbdJwlyYf+BRpYcTVUXddSQLxnvFodI2DX7OsXto ch6BkUf1vOH8ElktsuhQMyjXZG0S0k655MSsPUFns2trAIuisDg1AngRmhJpJMYPh2y4g3tSU xfLXSQMlHDT9wz3LZud8xg2Tv2CwnlfVLSuTn6Ng9IpL9JHkq3incwOoHR3vzsOJqXEmy2H8V wErky7DohFTHEc8+ySEDWExJYhDk5QTdWKKcq1twPYSW+m4iVYRpplkVH+zCIGxjB5EY6z6BW 5uzibHXX3hutyMz01T8T8cOescfjE2fAddSq1i7GpcK5GivCV/0/pimKVezq4K6m+jzAIuyVr XAuz1tXF8Y/WLlMo/dKGsQ1Y08DnamBDLPyKjnt6LDavekBZzG20STRXH47h9763PR3jwI0p3 ELhvw+uPRmO4tlwjn625TyRqdDkfaEorDC5xsRq90e4ZubwLCsgSikr1O3JnwlBu9kQmrfhgx TnPSJs7M+uYkCrATVIUZLQebRYRY3o2ivcM7HEBNLWznBJt/PhGkoYEBMskJBjN2/2qv0fFc0 GRl9bRM548vaxQ4+SKKJxvu2OyFR/1uqROIMk6pHdBGHJTr2U1leoLe3kK6LOidwcta0qyzQh xcUfTwxyCr9Bu+xILPLehbyxH1vAlCJYd7OT9UMlPoxO85B3CIDB8YhghX6SL1FpwbRVc6VzD bOdvmEvR4Z1HcV/Yn4vbIltV+jQUrKK2ACsyDM+YGVb15gKxelyayCI6GET9zjI6acAgG2Tmk 7SjlssWtOD7Nx53MayPBowDr3isCKpCtmwRL8z7kuvEoeLi+DrFoSpJl2DIA2S7nbTF0BAgvU N3ab6jFzTy1jkvSzOJ+UyT8GFuOSJ4tSCgRUUx5KEyYAZ3K7ZzCCe+pmGZjHIssHh0yVdVcfa /ykJ3CFgjgaVIvK/80cV182dCqeKtz1q+1P5ptklI34uz08uqNzwG+khhQ7AXYQa18ufIRPwh z8BU5VrRSUjXA5j6EoaJ+iolAoXdpBadHp6evXJ5lPZ+8KLXbWnom0ZC2A3qIal+YrP45Zof+ yKG+o2qIevd4rpbtpiWksXyasmZu7zPuk1ICiBs9lfkT3adrTiYjlpxMA==
X-Mailing-List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/779771
List-ID <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/3a92d032-5738-22ea-c924-def61a5e1346@gmx.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 31
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:22:12 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <3a92d032-5738-22ea-c924-def61a5e1346@gmx.com>
X-Original-References <9b0c4e1b-8629-b401-a0bf-ed1f4c0f826a@univ-lorraine.fr> <cone.1629207017.290125.16888.1000@masysma-18> <07bfb580-c23c-0241-eaab-170384f04f11@debianlists.mobilxpress.net>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.user:239091

Show key headers only | View raw


On 17/08/2021 15:03, Marco Möller wrote:
> I have no experience with SSD, but running my Debian Desktop from a USB
> Memory Stick since years, please allow me to share information which
> supports the suggestion of Linux-Fan to also investigate if there is
> extraordinary I/O taking place and maybe could be avoided:
> In the past I found extreme(!) I/O to be produced by Firefox, when it is
> writing its cache, and when it is writing its session restore
> information. These writes to my observation occure all the time, kind of
> nonstop! I could get it very satisfactorily reduced by applying a tool
> called "Profile Sync Daemon" (psd) from package "profile-sync-daemon".
> While it is packaged for Debian, as a starting point to study its
> documentation I suggest to better look it up in the Arch Linux Wiki.

Firefox setting which determines how often write session data to disk is:
browser.sessionstore.interval

Default setting is value of 15000 = 15 seconds, not that bad. But still
I changed that to 10 minutes (value of 600000). If I lose an open tab
once in a year when Firefox crashes, so be it. To be honest, I haven't
seen Fx crash in a year, or more.

--

With kindest regards, piorunz.

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

nvme SSD and poor performance Pierre Willaime <pierre.willaime@univ-lorraine.fr> - 2021-08-17 12:10 +0200
  Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-08-17 14:10 +0200
    Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Pierre Willaime <pierre.willaime@univ-lorraine.fr> - 2021-08-17 15:20 +0200
      Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-08-17 16:10 +0200
      Re: nvme SSD and poor performance David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-08-18 00:30 +0200
        Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Pierre Willaime <pierre.willaime@univ-lorraine.fr> - 2021-08-20 11:00 +0200
          Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Christian Britz <cbritz@t-online.de> - 2021-08-20 17:50 +0200
            Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2021-08-20 19:40 +0200
          Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2021-08-20 19:20 +0200
          Re: nvme SSD and poor performance "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2021-08-20 19:50 +0200
            Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Pierre Willaime <pierre.willaime@univ-lorraine.fr> - 2021-08-23 10:50 +0200
              Re: nvme SSD and poor performance "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2021-08-23 14:10 +0200
                Re: nvme SSD and poor performance piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com> - 2021-08-23 14:20 +0200
          Re: nvme SSD and poor performance David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2021-08-21 04:10 +0200
  Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2021-08-17 15:40 +0200
    Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Marco Möller <talby@debianlists.mobilxpress.net> - 2021-08-17 16:10 +0200
      Re: nvme SSD and poor performance piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com> - 2021-08-20 18:30 +0200
        Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Marco Möller <talby@debianlists.mobilxpress.net> - 2021-08-20 19:20 +0200
          Re: nvme SSD and poor performance piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com> - 2021-08-20 20:10 +0200
    Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Christian Britz <cbritz@t-online.de> - 2021-08-17 17:30 +0200
      Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2021-08-17 17:40 +0200
  Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-08-17 17:00 +0200
  Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2021-08-18 22:00 +0200
    Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2021-08-19 08:10 +0200
      Re: nvme SSD and poor performance Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2021-08-21 15:00 +0200

csiph-web