Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest]

From	Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest]
Date	2020-11-22 16:20 +0100
Message-ID	<BdZjI-2kL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<BdTeh-6Yv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BdYH0-1S7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BdZa1-2hC-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Du, 22 nov 20, 08:01:16, Charles Curley wrote:
> 
> * Starting a new email is usually easier than hijacking a thread, so
>   why bother?

Starting a new e-mail requires filling out at least the To: address so 
it is easier to reply instead (especially with many addresses in To: and 
Cc: that one wants to keep).

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-11-22 09:50 +0100
  Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest "Gareth Evans" <donotspam@fastmail.fm> - 2020-11-22 15:40 +0100
    Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-11-22 15:50 +0100
      Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest "D. R. Evans" <doc.evans@gmail.com> - 2020-11-22 16:20 +0100
    Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-11-22 16:00 +0100
    Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest tomas@tuxteam.de - 2020-11-22 16:00 +0100
    Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-11-22 16:10 +0100
      Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and  --link-dest] Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-11-22 16:20 +0100

csiph-web