Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #228765
| From | Graham Bull <graham.bull@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Encountered a bug with a dependency of wondershaper, but I'm unsure which dependency, and how to proceed with submitting a bug report |
| Date | 2020-11-18 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BcAx3-8mx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BcfCh-4qB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BcfVE-4xf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/17/20 9:34 PM, Dan Ritter wrote: > Graham Bull wrote: >> I've been using wondershaper on Debian Stable for the past couple of years >> and it's been excellent. >> >> I got a new pc recently with modern hardware and thus I installed Debian >> Testing on it. >> >> I've noticed when I set the same rules within wondershaper on Stable and >> Testing, I get different behavior. >> Stable acts as expected, low latency and able to hit the limits set. >> Testing suffers a lot of latency and I'm only able to reach a fraction of >> the limit set. >> >> When I remove the wondershaper rules everything works as expected (I can >> max my internet connection on both computers). >> >> I've determined Stable and Testing use the same version of >> wondershaper=1.1a-10. >> >> Wondershaper has one dependency: >> >> Stable: iproute2=4.20.0-2 >> Testing: iproute2=5.9.0-1 >> >> iproute2 has around 8 dependencies. >> >> At this point I'm confused about how I should proceed with debugging my >> issue. >> >> Any advice of how to collect more info for debugging purposes or how to >> proceed would be very much appreciated! > At this point, you might be better served by simply switching to > fq_codel, unless you have a particularly odd network connection. > > In my /etc/network/interfaces on the firewall: > up tc qdisc replace dev eth3 root fq_codel > > Wondershaper itself changed a lot after the 1.1 version that Debian > packages; you might want to ping the nominal maintainer and see > if they want to upgrade to 1.4.blah -- or, given the > availability of fq_codel, just drop the package. > > -dsr- > fq_codel seems to be a good replacement, thanks for the suggestion. However I decided to try the upstream version of wondershaper and to my surprise it worked perfectly. I then attempted to contact the Debian maintainer about upgrading the package but my email sadly bounced back. I am interested in getting the latest version of wondershaper into the Debian repos. If the current maintainer is unreachable do you have any ideas on how to proceed? Graham
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Encountered a bug with a dependency of wondershaper, but I'm unsure which dependency, and how to proceed with submitting a bug report Graham Bull <graham.bull@gmail.com> - 2020-11-17 21:20 +0100
Re: Encountered a bug with a dependency of wondershaper, but I'm unsure which dependency, and how to proceed with submitting a bug report Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-11-17 21:40 +0100
Re: Encountered a bug with a dependency of wondershaper, but I'm unsure which dependency, and how to proceed with submitting a bug report Graham Bull <graham.bull@gmail.com> - 2020-11-18 19:40 +0100
Re: Encountered a bug with a dependency of wondershaper, but I'm unsure which dependency, and how to proceed with submitting a bug report Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-11-18 20:10 +0100
Re: Encountered a bug with a dependency of wondershaper, but I'm unsure which dependency, and how to proceed with submitting a bug report Mirko Parthey <mirko.parthey@web.de> - 2020-11-18 18:40 +0100
csiph-web