Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #233243
| From | "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary |
| Date | 2021-03-19 18:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BUrgm-5ct-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BU12y-5Lh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <BUqaB-4Am-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 19.03.2021 21:23, Jochen Spieker wrote: >> Note : Linux installed on sdb (ext4) and sda is a NTFS file system and >> >> I don't want my SSD or HDD died suddenly > But I am afraid that is exactly what is happening. You can't be so sure, not until OP reports back with testing results. > I would not worry about the alignment issues at all. The problem is that > one of your disks is having bad sectors which still need to be > reallocated. That means you may already have data loss. Chances are that > the number of bad sectors is going to increase over time which is going > to lead to more data loss. > > My personal advice would be to replace the failing disk with a new one > and restore from a known-good backup. If you lack money, you can try to > find a used disk, but I would only pay for something which I have > checked with smartcl beforehand. If you lack a backup, you can only hope > that you have lost nothing of value and get a new disk as fast as > possible. Personally, I don't think it is wise to throw away any HDD as soon as it gets a few pending bad blocks for whatever reason. I had a drive with remapped bad blocks in SMART and that amount stayed the same for years, despite its workload and periodical full surface scan. I mean platter surface with the modern sector density is not perfect. It simply can't be. Even brand new drives are shipped with information about factory remapped sectors in special section inside their firmware, to cover up platter imperfections. 10 sectors are nothing compared to billions of them on a multi-terrabyte drive, if they don't grow in numbers over time, because say platter contamination, and the drive is not failing mechanically, so each case should be examined carefully. This is why performing regular backups and validating them is better, I mean you do it all anyway, than replacing drives as soon as they get a few bad sectors. -- With kindest regards, Alexander. ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Robbi Nespu <robbinespu@gmail.com> - 2021-03-18 14:40 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary IL Ka <kazakevichilya@gmail.com> - 2021-03-18 15:00 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary IL Ka <kazakevichilya@gmail.com> - 2021-03-18 15:50 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-03-18 16:30 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary IL Ka <kazakevichilya@gmail.com> - 2021-03-18 17:00 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-03-18 17:30 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Robbi Nespu <robbinespu@gmail.com> - 2021-03-19 03:00 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2021-03-18 16:40 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary IL Ka <kazakevichilya@gmail.com> - 2021-03-18 16:50 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2021-03-18 17:00 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Robbi Nespu <robbinespu@gmail.com> - 2021-03-19 02:50 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Robbi Nespu <robbinespu@gmail.com> - 2021-03-18 15:50 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2021-03-18 19:10 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Robbi Nespu <robbinespu@gmail.com> - 2021-03-19 03:30 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2021-03-19 10:00 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2021-03-20 10:00 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2021-03-20 11:20 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Robbi Nespu <robbinespu@gmail.com> - 2021-03-23 05:10 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2021-03-19 17:30 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2021-03-19 18:40 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2021-03-19 22:10 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-03-20 18:10 +0100
Re: fsck error on boot: /dev/sda1: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY and Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2021-03-20 20:30 +0100
csiph-web