Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #231641
| From | The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly |
| Date | 2021-02-12 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BHGdc-aH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <BHEuL-7Kw-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | This space intentionally left blank. |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2021-02-12 at 06:02, thahn01@t-online.de wrote: > Hello, > I have installed 10.7 and then > apt upgrade > without any problems. > However the following > apt dist-upgrade > failed badly and cannot be repaired with > apt --fix-broken install > > Correcting dependencies... failed. > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > ffmpeg : Depends: libavcodec58 (= 7:4.1.6-1~deb10u1) > Depends: libavformat58 (= 7:4.1.6-1~deb10u1) but 7:4.3.1-8 is installed > Depends: libavutil56 (= 7:4.1.6-1~deb10u1) but 7:4.3.1-8 is installed > Depends: libswresample3 (= 7:4.1.6-1~deb10u1) but 7:4.3.1-8 is installed > gimp : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.29) but 2.28-10 is installed > libaa1 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.29) but 2.28-10 is installed > ... > > Any advice? What do the following commands give you? $ apt-cache policy ffmpeg libavcodec58 libavformat58 libavutil56 libswresample3 libc6 $ apt-mark showhold Also, do you have any package pins in /etc/apt/preferences or /etc/apt/preferences.d/* ? That said: dist-upgrade against sid is frequently a bad idea, and I am not at all surprised that you ran into issues. The usual comment about running sid is that "if anything breaks, you get to keep the pieces". The best recommendation as I understand matters is to have sources.list entries for both testing and sid, use /etc/apt/preferences to pin sid at a priority which will never be chosen by default, and then install items from sid selectively as needed. If this is a production system rather than primarily a test machine, you might be best served to reinstall, and this time not try to dist-upgrade against sid en masse. For myself, I have sources.list entries for stable and testing, and in the rare case that I need something from sid, modify sources.list long enough to 'apt-get update ; apt-get install [packagename]', then modify sources.list to its previous state and run 'apt-get update' again. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
dist-upgrade from buster fails badly "thahn01@t-online.de" <thahn01@t-online.de> - 2021-02-12 12:10 +0100
Re: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-02-12 12:40 +0100
AW: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly "thahn01@t-online.de" <thahn01@t-online.de> - 2021-02-12 13:40 +0100
Re: AW: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly pioruns2019 <pioruns2019@gmx.com> - 2021-02-12 14:00 +0100
Re: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2021-02-12 14:10 +0100
Re: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-12 14:10 +0100
Re: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly pioruns2019 <pioruns2019@gmx.com> - 2021-02-12 14:40 +0100
Re: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-02-12 15:10 +0100
Re: AW: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly pioruns2020 <pioruns2020@gmx.com> - 2021-02-12 14:10 +0100
Re: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-02-12 14:00 +0100
Re: dist-upgrade from buster fails badly Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-12 14:00 +0100
csiph-web