Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #225751
| Path | csiph.com!4.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.uzoreto.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? |
| Date | Sun, 02 Aug 2020 22:00:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Azsjf-1CS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <AxYGB-38y-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Aza2Z-7oW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Azdax-SZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AzrGy-1pK-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-user@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Sun Aug 2 19:55:26 2020 |
| Old-Return-Path | <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-6.898 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .lionunicorn. - helo: .mail-gw.thundermail. - helo-domain: .thundermail.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -3.5 |
| X-Asg-Debug-ID | 1596398109-0554134219222fd60001-KlT975 |
| X-Barracuda-Envelope-From | deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk |
| X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP | cloud204.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk[149.255.60.149] |
| X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP | 149.255.60.149 |
| Authentication-Results | cloud204.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk; spf=pass (sender IP is 70.179.160.248) smtp.mailfrom=deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk smtp.helo=axis.corp |
| Received-Spf | pass (cloud204.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk: connection is authenticated) |
| X-Asg-Orig-Subj | Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? |
| Reply-To | debian-user@lists.debian.org |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
| X-Ppp-Message-ID | <20200802195508.4183888.91933@cloud204.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk> |
| X-Ppp-Vhost | lionunicorn.co.uk |
| X-Barracuda-Connect | cloud204.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk[149.255.60.149] |
| X-Barracuda-Start-Time | 1596398109 |
| X-Barracuda-Encrypted | ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 |
| X-Barracuda-URL | https://149.255.60.66:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi |
| X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size | 2651 |
| X-Barracuda-Brts-Status | 1 |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Score | 0.00 |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Status | No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=1.9 tests= |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Report | Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.83648 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/766087 |
| List-ID | <debian-user.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20200802195436.GA12689@axis.corp |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 67 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:54:36 -0500 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20200802195436.GA12689@axis.corp> |
| X-Original-References | <5F21A620.1090409@surfnaked.ca> <ead30df9-861d-ca3b-9dd0-8c2aaa9f807e@att.net> <20200802034317.GL29877@randomstring.org> <a6a9f76b-3b74-cb29-c820-b60e798dc73b@att.net> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.user:225751 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sun 02 Aug 2020 at 14:09:50 (-0500), Leslie Rhorer wrote: > On 8/1/2020 10:43 PM, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Leslie Rhorer wrote: > > > On 7/29/2020 11:38 AM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > > > > As for partition sizing, I set up my machines with three partitions: > > > > /, /home, and swap. > > > > > > I don't implement a separate partition for /home. Instead, I place it on > > > my data array where it gets backed up nightly > > > > This may be a problem for the original poster, who has only > > admitted to a laptop, nothing else. > > I must have missed that. > > > > RAID 1 array formatted as ext2. Since /boot almost never gets written, > > > there is no need for journalling. That leaves a full 98G for / on a pair of > > > > I don't understand why you think journalling takes an excessive > > amount of space > > I never said it does. It does take up a little space, but not a > significant amount. What does take up space is /home, which can get > to be huge. Even on a laptop, making /home a part of the largest > partition is a good idea. What it sharing the partition with /home? And what is it's mountpoint? > Giving it its own partition permanently > sequesters any space allocated to the purpose, to no particular > advantage. Making it simply a directory on the largest drive target > frees up all the unused space for other use. Even on most laptops, > the largest partition is usually not /, Which one is, usually? > and in any case, as mentioned > previously, it is generally better for / and /home to be on separate > targets. In the previous post, we had "data array" aka "data repository", SSDs for booting, and a NAS or file server (whose data repository needs to be huge), plus a "single set of array spindles". With that wide choice, I'm not clear what "targets" are, nor how all these different items are arranged with respect to the PC itself (or which are entirely separate entities). > This does not mean /home has to be on a separate partition > of its own. > > , or why you would go out of your way to turn it > > off. Ever. Turning off safety mechanisms is generally not > > something anyone should advocate without a big flashing warning > > sign. > > Journalling is only a safety mechanism if the file system is being > written. Since /boot is to all intents and purposes never written, > journaling does nothing for it. The /boot partition can be mounted > read-only, as a matter of fact. What are the benefits of /boot on a RAID? Does that mean that a RAID has to be assembled even before the PC can boot up? Cheers, David.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@surfnaked.ca> - 2020-07-29 20:10 +0200
Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-07-30 04:20 +0200
Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2020-07-30 04:40 +0200
Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? Leslie Rhorer <lesrhorer@att.net> - 2020-08-02 02:30 +0200
Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-08-02 05:50 +0200
Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-08-02 06:20 +0200
Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? Leslie Rhorer <lesrhorer@att.net> - 2020-08-02 21:20 +0200
Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-08-02 22:00 +0200
Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? Leslie Rhorer <lesrhorer@att.net> - 2020-08-02 23:40 +0200
Re: Are the assigned capacities sufficient for my setup? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-08-11 06:20 +0200
csiph-web