Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #223599
| From | Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... |
| Date | 2020-06-17 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AiLUZ-4WS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <AiDkK-8kt-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AiLLj-4TH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi. On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:10:51PM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > 2. AIUI dd(1) uses asynchronous (buffered) I/O unless told otherwise. You seem to confuse asynchronous and cached I/O too. >From Linux kernel POV, *asynchronous* I/O is a pair of io_submit/io_getevents syscalls, and dd does not do these regardless of the options that are provided. What dd does is a *synchronous* I/O (read/write syscalls or pread64/pwrite64 for older kernels). Whenever the I/O is cached (an output file is opened without O_DIRECT|O_DSYNC flags) or not is orthogonal to whenever it's sync or async. For the true async I/O you'll need something like fio, not dd. Reco
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com> - 2020-06-17 12:20 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com> - 2020-06-17 12:20 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-06-17 16:10 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-06-18 01:00 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd ... "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2020-06-17 12:50 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2020-06-17 13:30 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2020-06-17 14:00 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-06-17 15:50 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2020-06-17 16:10 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com> - 2020-06-17 17:50 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-06-17 21:20 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-06-17 21:30 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2020-06-17 22:30 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-06-17 22:40 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-06-17 22:50 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-06-17 23:10 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-06-17 23:10 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2020-06-18 00:00 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-06-18 08:00 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2020-06-18 15:00 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-06-18 16:30 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2020-06-18 18:00 +0200
Re: Could RAM possibly be just 3-4 times faster than bare hdd writes and reads? or, is the Linux kernel doing its 'magic' in the bg? or, ... Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-06-17 23:10 +0200
csiph-web