Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first one (eth0) is always pingable"

From	Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first one (eth0) is always pingable"
Date	2020-08-24 13:20 +0200
Message-ID	<AHiG6-2xI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <AGAc1-JI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AGD9T-2tL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <AGD9T-2tL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AGEfD-3mu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <AH3H4-1Vm-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,

On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 09:16:48PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
> > This really sounds like you're trying to test out a scenario in
> > a situation where it can't possibly work.
> > 
> 
> But this is exactly what he has to do - connect two wired network interfaces
> to a managed switch. Then configure LAGG (LACP) on the switch for the two
> ports and LAGG (LACP) on the PC/server.

Have I misunderstood how the OP is trying to replicate it though? My
Understanding was they are taking a bare metal machine with one
Ethernet and one WiFi, then exporting those to a virtual machine as
two virtual Ethernets. Then they are trying to use the bonding
driver on those virtual Ethernets.

I use bonding on bare metal servers a lot and it "just works". I
don't know what is wrong in OP's case but if they really are trying
to do it the way I understand then I suspect those who say the WiFi
is the problem are correct.

Cheers,
Andy

Thread

In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first one  (eth0) is always pingable" Jaikumar Sharma <jaikumar.sharma@gmail.com> - 2020-08-21 17:20 +0200
  Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-08-21 18:10 +0200
    Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first one (eth0) is always pingable" deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-08-21 19:40 +0200
    Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Jaikumar Sharma <jaikumar.sharma@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 07:50 +0200
      Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first one (eth0) is always pingable" deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 09:50 +0200
    Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Jaikumar Sharma <jaikumar.sharma@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 13:20 +0200
      Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-08-22 13:50 +0200
        Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 14:30 +0200
          Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-08-22 14:50 +0200
            Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 16:00 +0200
              Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Jaikumar Sharma <jaikumar.sharma@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 17:10 +0200
        Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Jaikumar Sharma <jaikumar.sharma@gmail.com> - 2020-08-22 17:00 +0200
          Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-08-22 18:10 +0200
            Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first one (eth0) is always pingable" deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-08-23 21:20 +0200
              Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Jaikumar Sharma <jaikumar.sharma@gmail.com> - 2020-08-24 11:30 +0200
                Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first one (eth0) is always pingable" deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-08-24 22:10 +0200
              Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-08-24 13:20 +0200
            Re: In network bonding second nic (eth1) is not pingable while first  one (eth0) is always pingable" Jaikumar Sharma <jaikumar.sharma@gmail.com> - 2020-08-24 11:50 +0200

csiph-web