Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #222618
| From | Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: dual screen: some operations are slow (nouveau driver) |
| Date | 2020-05-18 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <A7PIB-45x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <A7Otb-3aa-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Some additional information... When I change the configuration to xrandr --output DP-3 --auto --output eDP-1 --auto --right-of DP-3 (usual dual screen settings), /var/log/Xorg.0.log shows: modeset(0): Allocate new frame buffer 7040x2160 stride because 3840 + 3200 = 7040 and max(2160,1800) = 2160. And when I do xrandr --output eDP-1 --off to disable the laptop screen, /var/log/Xorg.0.log shows: modeset(0): Allocate new frame buffer 3840x2160 stride corresponding to the external 4K monitor. I was wondering whether the performance issue with the dual screen settings could be related to the size of the frame buffer. So I tried xrandr --output DP-3 --auto --output eDP-1 --auto --same-as DP-3 in which case, the frame buffer size is still 3840x2160, and both screens show the same content (except that the laptop screen, which has a lower definition, does not show some bottom and right parts). But even in this case, I notice the same performance issue. I would add that if I switch to a Linux console (Ctrl-Alt-F1), I get the same contents on both screens (though only 3200x1800 is used), and everything is very fast: I can't "move windows" there, but the scrolling tests do not show any performance issue, unlike with xorg. Any idea? -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
dual screen: some operations are slow (nouveau driver) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2020-05-18 16:00 +0200
Re: dual screen: some operations are slow (nouveau driver) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2020-05-18 17:20 +0200
Re: dual screen: some operations are slow (nouveau driver) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-05-18 19:00 +0200
Re: dual screen: some operations are slow (nouveau driver) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2020-05-18 19:20 +0200
Re: dual screen: some operations are slow (nouveau driver) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-05-18 19:50 +0200
Re: dual screen: some operations are slow (nouveau driver) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2020-05-18 21:30 +0200
Re: dual screen: some operations are slow (nouveau driver) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2020-05-18 21:40 +0200
Re: dual screen: some operations are slow (nouveau driver) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2020-05-19 01:30 +0200
csiph-web