Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #6328 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arul Anand MM <arulanandkk1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-06-18 21:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2024-06-19 23:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.security
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
CVE applicability Arul Anand MM <arulanandkk1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 21:00 +0200
Re: CVE applicability Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-06-19 08:00 +0200
Re: CVE applicability Thomas Hochstein <thh@thh.name> - 2024-06-19 23:50 +0200
| From | Arul Anand MM <arulanandkk1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-18 21:00 +0200 |
| Subject | CVE applicability |
| Message-ID | <IQMdH-3RwF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hello Debian Security Team, This is regarding Debian advisory https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-3390. I would like to confirm whether version 5.10.191-1 is impacted by the UAF and LPE. Advisory page on September 14 https://web.archive.org/web/20230924174231/https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-3390 states the issue is fixed in 5.10.191-1 but the current version of advisory states "5.10.209-2" as the fixed version. Is there any information on the impacted version changes for CVE-2023-3390? Thanks.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-19 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IQWwp-3XTu-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #6328 |
Hi, On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:04:45AM +0530, Arul Anand MM wrote: > Hello Debian Security Team, > > This is regarding Debian advisory > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-3390. > > I would like to confirm whether version 5.10.191-1 is impacted by the UAF > and LPE. > > Advisory page on September 14 > https://web.archive.org/web/20230924174231/https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-3390 > states the issue is fixed in 5.10.191-1 but the current version of advisory > states "5.10.209-2" as the fixed version. Is there any information on the > impacted version changes for CVE-2023-3390? All the version information required is actually on https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-3390 . In the lower table you see where the fix landed, In the table above you see the current available versions in the suites, with their status. But maybe I'm missunderstanding the question? Regards, Salvatore
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Hochstein <thh@thh.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-19 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IRblL-48rS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #6328 |
Arul Anand MM wrote: > Advisory page on September 14 > https://web.archive.org/web/20230924174231/https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-3390 > states the issue is fixed in 5.10.191-1 No, it doesn't. It states the issue was fixed - for bullseye, i.e. oldstable - in 5.10.179-3 (lower table). It also states that 5.10.191-1 was the current version in "bullseye (security)", so that suite was not vulnerable. > but the current version of advisory > states "5.10.209-2" as the fixed version. No, it doesn't. :-) It still states the issue was fixed in 5.10.179-3 (lower table). The current version in "bullseye (security)" is now 5.10.218-1, and in "bullseye" it's 5.10.209-2, so neither suite is vulnerable. The fixed version doesn't change. The current version in suites that still get updates does, of course. -thh
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.security
csiph-web