Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #6076 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friedhelm Waitzmann <fach220408.fwnsp@xoxy.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-04-17 10:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2022-04-21 23:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.security
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? Friedhelm Waitzmann <fach220408.fwnsp@xoxy.net> - 2022-04-17 10:30 +0200
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@elstel.org> - 2022-04-17 10:30 +0200
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2022-04-17 11:00 +0200
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu> - 2022-04-17 14:40 +0200
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2022-04-17 15:10 +0200
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2022-04-21 23:10 +0200
| From | Friedhelm Waitzmann <fach220408.fwnsp@xoxy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-04-17 10:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? |
| Message-ID | <Ed8s9-9iWD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 piorunz: >On 12/04/2022 04:59, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote: >> You mean, that it is possible to run amd64 on my old hardware >> >> >> 1# >> >> vendor_id : GenuineIntel >> cpu family : 6 >> model : 22 >> model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 440 @ 2.00GHz >> stepping : 1 >> microcode : 0x43 >> cpu MHz : 1229.629 >> cache size : 512 KB >> >> and >> >> 2# >> >> vendor_id : GenuineIntel >> cpu family : 15 >> model : 2 >> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.00GHz >> stepping : 4 >> cpu MHz : 1993.656 >> cache size : 512 KB >> >> ? >Celeron 440 for sure is 64-bit. Pentium 4 2.00 GHz I am not >sure, there are many models and variations of this processor. Is >it socket LGA775 also? It is a Willamette on a socket 423. Friedhelm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFOBAEBCgA4FiEEzf8af16GP0HJOpBzgEIvCiHZTesFAmJbyJUaHGZhY2gyMjA0 MDguZnduc3BAeG94eS5uZXQACgkQgEIvCiHZTevUVQgAr6A6NmLgghgCeMuahMxK aH5qzjteq8ZqinBpV2OWo9K4XkMkYXG/1YUfa0Ky9a+XGNP0EVyWjubcbxYCLxsH iuD7gh7Om7Iim93cNF51wJwn6zJMraOua4ke0XAngX+LID4Fxkj3eAGqAZqEJDAr dV7aj2SSZ+5i/u0KaEDP8uozcBx34fcxlayIMiTTm1odNgRIyFutOcLu55KQs30c VGxb5M/T98UJVRwhABpVD4jlKnesjExJO4tmvxG7xGuC1qxz3OBAEzECoerhd0sD NVoOOb0ARgn1pyPNo+YTcGSQxUDV8bZhZSR38i7zXYf3nH24MpSgnEW759w92MCc 1w== =UEtL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@elstel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-04-17 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Ed8s9-9iWD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #6076 |
I haven´t heard yet of a Pentium IV supporting amd64. Likely it does not exist. On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 10:05:39AM +0200, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > piorunz: > > On 12/04/2022 04:59, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote: > > > You mean, that it is possible to run amd64 on my old hardware > > > > > > > > > 1# > > > > > > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > > > cpu family : 6 > > > model : 22 > > > model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 440 @ 2.00GHz > > > stepping : 1 > > > microcode : 0x43 > > > cpu MHz : 1229.629 > > > cache size : 512 KB > > > > > > and > > > > > > 2# > > > > > > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > > > cpu family : 15 > > > model : 2 > > > model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.00GHz > > > stepping : 4 > > > cpu MHz : 1993.656 > > > cache size : 512 KB > > > > > > ? > > > Celeron 440 for sure is 64-bit. Pentium 4 2.00 GHz I am not sure, there > > are many models and variations of this processor. Is it socket LGA775 > > also? > > It is a Willamette on a socket 423. > > > > Friedhelm > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQFOBAEBCgA4FiEEzf8af16GP0HJOpBzgEIvCiHZTesFAmJbyJUaHGZhY2gyMjA0 > MDguZnduc3BAeG94eS5uZXQACgkQgEIvCiHZTevUVQgAr6A6NmLgghgCeMuahMxK > aH5qzjteq8ZqinBpV2OWo9K4XkMkYXG/1YUfa0Ky9a+XGNP0EVyWjubcbxYCLxsH > iuD7gh7Om7Iim93cNF51wJwn6zJMraOua4ke0XAngX+LID4Fxkj3eAGqAZqEJDAr > dV7aj2SSZ+5i/u0KaEDP8uozcBx34fcxlayIMiTTm1odNgRIyFutOcLu55KQs30c > VGxb5M/T98UJVRwhABpVD4jlKnesjExJO4tmvxG7xGuC1qxz3OBAEzECoerhd0sD > NVoOOb0ARgn1pyPNo+YTcGSQxUDV8bZhZSR38i7zXYf3nH24MpSgnEW759w92MCc > 1w== > =UEtL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-04-17 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Ed8Vb-9j5O-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #6077 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@elstel.org> (2022-04-17): > I haven´t heard yet of a Pentium IV supporting amd64. > Likely it does not exist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_4_processors seems to disagree in general. Willamette seems to be old enough to be 32-bit only though. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-04-17 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Edcm5-9laA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #6078 |
On 4/17/22 4:52 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@elstel.org> (2022-04-17): >> I haven´t heard yet of a Pentium IV supporting amd64. >> Likely it does not exist. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_4_processors seems > to disagree in general. Willamette seems to be old enough to be 32-bit > only though. > Interesting. The architecture is called amd64 quite rightfully in my opinion, as it was first introduced by release in 2003 of Opteron CPU (project Hammer) by AMD (Advanced Micro Devices): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opteron However, Intel continued calling CPUs "Pentium 4" and since 2004 Intel CPUs in Wikipedia article Cyril mentions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_4_processors are said to be "Intel 64". That article does not mention the core CPU data width not address width. If my memory serves me, these were the same 32 bit CPUs with "physical address extension" just expanding the ability of CPU to handle larger address space. So, wikipedia article about Pentium CPU is at least wrong when it points "Intel 64" to Opteron (Amd64 or its x86_64 synonym). But somebody more knowledgeable in the history may correct me. <rant> Incidentally, technical documentation on Intel website for these later pentiums is not acessible. I just tried to take a look at the technical documentation to prove for myself that I'm wrong above... but no information from primary source: Intel, just something on wikipedia (and we don't even know who takes responsibility for what wikipedia page says). </rant> Valeri PS Of course, 32 bit CPU core can handle 64 bit data and addresses by using multiple operations for what 64 bit CPU will use a single one. Like pocket calculators which are using 1 to 4 bit addition register, yet happily processing really large numbers. > > Cheers,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-04-17 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EdcP7-9lzH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #6076 |
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 10:05:39AM +0200, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote: >>>vendor_id : GenuineIntel >>>cpu family : 15 >>>model : 2 >>>model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.00GHz >>>stepping : 4 >>>cpu MHz : 1993.656 >>>cache size : 512 KB >>> >>>? > >>Celeron 440 for sure is 64-bit. Pentium 4 2.00 GHz I am not sure, >>there are many models and variations of this processor. Is it socket >>LGA775 also? > >It is a Willamette on a socket 423. Nope, that would be model 1; model 2 was northwood. It's much easier to look at the family/model than trying to guess based on the marketing name. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/27433/intel-pentium-4-processor-2-00-ghz-512k-cache-400-mhz-fsb.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-04-21 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EeMdP-aiAC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #6076 |
On Sun, 17 Apr 2022, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote: > > > You mean, that it is possible to run amd64 on my old hardware I had quite a lot of trouble mapping this a long time ago for intel-microcode. I ended up using several sources including, but not limited to: ark.intel.com, the processor specification datasheets available at intel.com, and boot logs. And ark.intel.com proved to not be correct at least once from what little I recall. So, FWIW, according to the work I did at that time: > > > cpu family : 6 > > > model : 22 > > > model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 440 @ 2.00GHz > > > stepping : 1 sig 0x10661, 64-bit capable, latest public microcode update: rev 0x43 > > > cpu family : 15 > > > model : 2 > > > model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.00GHz > > > stepping : 4 sig 0xf24, 32-bit only, latest public microcode update: rev 0x20. -- Henrique Holschuh
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.security
csiph-web