Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #5801

Re: Reintroducing openjdk-8 for Bullseye?

From Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: Reintroducing openjdk-8 for Bullseye?
Date 2020-04-09 21:20 +0200
Message-ID <zTKSt-5Pi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <zTKIN-5Lf-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


* Graham Inggs:

> As of nvidia-cuda-toolkit 10.1.243, upstream stopped shipping the
> bundle JRE, and expect users to download it directly from Oracle.  We
> are considering our options, and one which is very attractive for us
> is for openjdk-8 to be reintroduced for Bullseye, but the question is
> who gets to maintain it?

Why did they stop providing the bundled JDK?  Do the AdoptOpenJDK
builds work?  If not, then why would a Debian build of openjdk-8 be
any different?

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Reintroducing openjdk-8 for Bullseye? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2020-04-09 21:10 +0200
  Re: Reintroducing openjdk-8 for Bullseye? Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2020-04-09 21:20 +0200
    Re: Reintroducing openjdk-8 for Bullseye? Ihor Antonov <ihor@antonovs.family> - 2020-04-09 22:10 +0200
    Re: Reintroducing openjdk-8 for Bullseye? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2020-04-09 22:30 +0200
      Re: Reintroducing openjdk-8 for Bullseye? Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org> - 2020-04-09 23:00 +0200

csiph-web