Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5763
| From | Patrick Schleizer <adrelanos@riseup.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: package for security advice |
| Date | 2020-03-07 12:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zHFvc-457-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <zHE65-370-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Russell Coker: > I think it would be good to have a package for improving system security. https://github.com/Whonix/security-misc > It > could depend on packages like spectre-meltdown-checker and also contain > scripts that look for ways of improving system security. For example > recommend SE Linux or Apparmor (if you don't have one installed), recommend > lockdown=confidentiality if using kernel 5.4 or greater, and do other similar > checks and warnings. Maybe you're looking for a hardened by default Debian derivative? https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Kicksecure > For each issue there would ideally be a URL provided > (maybe to the Debian Wiki, maybe to somewhere else) that describes the issue. https://www.whonix.org/wiki/System_Hardening_Checklist > I'm not saying that everyone should use all these features, just that everyone > who cares about security should know what the options are and have made an > informed choice that they can easily review. > > For subsystems that are complex and security critical (like Apache and Samba > for example) you could have other packages providing check scripts that look > for common configuration choices that might reduce security. Such scripts > would be designed to give false positives rather than false negatives. The > idea being that if you do something potentially risky then you should be aware > of it and so should whoever takes over your job in a few years time. Then at > relevant times (EG after an upgrade to a new release of Debian) decisions > about security can be reviewed. > > What do you think about this idea? The Problem with Security Guides and How We Can Fix It https://forums.whonix.org/t/the-problem-with-security-guides-and-how-we-can-fix-it/8563
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
package for security advice Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> - 2020-03-07 10:40 +0100
Re: package for security advice Patrick Schleizer <adrelanos@riseup.net> - 2020-03-07 12:10 +0100
Re: package for security advice Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2020-03-07 13:00 +0100
Re: package for security advice Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2020-03-07 13:10 +0100
Re: package for security advice "vince@vheuser.com" <vince@vheuser.com> - 2020-03-07 13:50 +0100
Re: package for security advice Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> - 2020-03-07 14:30 +0100
Re: package for security advice Jonathan Hutchins <hutchins@tarcanfel.org> - 2020-03-07 19:10 +0100
Re: package for security advice Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> - 2020-03-07 19:30 +0100
Re: package for security advice "vince@vheuser.com" <vince@vheuser.com> - 2020-03-07 20:20 +0100
Re: package for security advice Jonathan Hutchins <hutchins@tarcanfel.org> - 2020-03-08 00:20 +0100
Re: package for security advice Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> - 2020-03-07 20:10 +0100
csiph-web