Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5276
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: Different MD5 from same kernel module tun.ko on different servers same distro |
| Date | Sun, 03 Sep 2017 04:30:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ulsPD-2xW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uls3f-1WP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-security-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 3 02:22:58 2017 |
| Old-Return-Path | <paul.is.wise@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-7.499 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -7 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=mCkvgXPTbqA72UMzFQuqDOpFSb9UhnFjGyIh7K51w/s=; b=BdAIl5gC6sjmXyROmHAaj9vMAzUxxgbPgGew0KZcv9aUuBQ7x6Gn8N6A8Nzo17TeB1 Ciwxaml5snkBSxydP0xI1QxFW7oy9nTsg4uMYVxe9JmCBapt5DsJN9LNKfI9F/hzVcjC oDLV2EhVB9PWfw3Z92jk27F3QoX30I7iuCu4FJtc+Xli+foNtqqoM74beHztoYOrnUYe 6Io8GYiVXc4vxcDvee4uEppjlo0115/NYihsAQPHwIZD5IcRNpEJAZ3yCKsZr+g4M/6Y rvBKnpXpjWpnZEUixqJc+9+zTympCvapW1vkx5TglkVJ1KOwf6wofMRFuHNtp6vmk9oi WCuQ== |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mCkvgXPTbqA72UMzFQuqDOpFSb9UhnFjGyIh7K51w/s=; b=MbDpuewZma+bYpmOdQBzxQgOiku74slOcpYntCmAIa1eYxKzgB364l4vpCvtOV/gve 4RPkVAszPN4rNS7s96YXDrYuFxzPwYnLiWV+/B2jhkz+ontLjfBTtuynYPkXYkruw7fo CxHsmSSYbqrPcfHqQdIhBg8Hoan7pflcMhjAipqaYsIMkAqDG/QDPxs7tjq3GZbgZIcq PsVrpR8MPOpaKlH6QT2ohHYunJay1IYu7EtsevqTcG1UGKXKiPkbXIEWtkbIaJ5JEK+5 qne6Pt7uBjouwTbPpU0GRvPET8wA7b5XVkkblzMMwSWTHX9cdjON3kVDuejMA3cp5ZGD /nhA== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AHPjjUg6lTAj4fwpQ0ifwxutawkNjFCZV+DF5DVPu4B4rXdx41ss/Nmj HdWfVwIPHKvCzU63cstQMwYkGQRvMw== |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | ADKCNb79DgHw6f4yvK/hRm1aqeEqpmS+q9DUypIqoOPvGwkqJO4YXcnTeNiIjp+W/1SMqGMVrudBECxPC3EZWSASKYk= |
| X-Received | by 10.202.78.151 with SMTP id c145mr7322334oib.200.1504405349368; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 19:22:29 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Google-Sender-Auth | eyBvLxN6irTlAPmeCQshFwlGgHE |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-security@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/28355 |
| List-ID | <debian-security.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAKTje6E1nCkFoOKXU7muQo8kmR=KGHxLyfTy0__L1KZBvnowRQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 42 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-security@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Sun, 3 Sep 2017 10:22:28 +0800 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CAKTje6E1nCkFoOKXU7muQo8kmR=KGHxLyfTy0__L1KZBvnowRQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <197732dcf1798bb66013349212e3a04c.squirrel@127.0.0.1> |
| X-Original-Sender | paul.is.wise@gmail.com |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.security:5276 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 9:17 AM, x9p wrote: > the differences between both files doesn't look that much (vimdiff on xxd > output below), just wondering what might have caused such differences > between the same kernel module, from the same package, same distribution. A better tool to compare binaries is diffoscope, it can disassembles ELF binaries and compare the assembly. Please upload the two tun.ko files to the trydiffoscope website so that we can investigate the differences more closely: https://try.diffoscope.org/ > 00037a0: 2f62 7569 6c64 2f6c 696e 7578 2d31 774a /build/linux-1wJ | > 00037a0: 2f62 7569 6c64 2f6c 696e 7578 2d63 6835 /build/linux-ch5 > 00037b0: 4f58 392f 6c69 6e75 782d 332e 3136 2e34 OX9/linux-3.16.4 | > 00037b0: 3366 412f 6c69 6e75 782d 332e 3136 2e34 3fA/linux-3.16.4 > > 0003870: 696e 7578 2d31 774a 4f58 392f 6c69 6e75 inux-1wJOX9/linu | > 0003870: 696e 7578 2d63 6835 3366 412f 6c69 6e75 inux-ch53fA/linu > > 00038a0: 2f62 7569 6c64 2f6c 696e 7578 2d31 774a /build/linux-1wJ | > 00038a0: 2f62 7569 6c64 2f6c 696e 7578 2d63 6835 /build/linux-ch5 > 00038b0: 4f58 392f 6c69 6e75 782d 332e 3136 2e34 OX9/linux-3.16.4 | > 00038b0: 3366 412f 6c69 6e75 782d 332e 3136 2e34 3fA/linux-3.16.4 These look like they are two different builds of the Debian Linux kernel package. If you or your cloud provider did not rebuild the Debian Linux kernel package, then it is possible your cloud server has been compromised and tun.ko modified with the version from a different build of the package. Are there any other modified files on the system? You can use debsums to check. PS: I would suggest upgrading to Debian stretch at some point. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Different MD5 from same kernel module tun.ko on different servers same distro "x9p" <debian-security@x9pneu.com> - 2017-09-03 03:40 +0200
Re: Different MD5 from same kernel module tun.ko on different servers same distro Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-09-03 04:30 +0200
Re: Different MD5 from same kernel module tun.ko on different servers same distro "x9p" <debian-security@x9pneu.com> - 2017-09-03 05:00 +0200
csiph-web