Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #4780
| From | Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the Security Team? |
| Date | 2016-05-13 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rys2l-2ju-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rye94-59C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ryf58-6fM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Just wanted to tell that I am quite happy not to have boringSSL in Debian - main. I think it is depeerable there apart from the security risk of adopting the SSL package from a company which was largely funded by intelligence services and the Pentagon. I would rather like to see OpenBSD`s libressl as an option for Debian. I believe the OpenBSD programmers have done a pretty good job at it! Elmar Am 2016-05-13 um 08:44 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff: > 殷啟聰 <seamlikok@gmail.com> schrieb: >> Dear Debian Security Team, > > Our contact address is team@security.debian.org, not debian-security... > >> The "android-tools" packaging team >> <https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=android-tools-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org> >> are introducing BoringSSL, a fork of OpenSSL by Google. The latest >> Android OS and its SDK no longer use OpenSSL and they use some APIs >> only provided by BoringSSL, hence we are bringing BoringSSL to Debian. >> You can see the ITP at <https://bugs.debian.org/823933>. > > No, that's not acceptable. You can try to provide that additional APIs > on top of OpenSSL, but we're not going to support an entire OpenSSL > fork just for Google's NIH syndrome. > > Cheers, > Moritz >
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the Security Team? 殷啟聰 <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 07:50 +0200
Re: Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the Security Team? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-05-13 08:50 +0200
Re: Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the Security Team? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-05-13 21:10 +0200
Re: Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the Security Team? Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 22:40 +0200
Re: Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the Security Team? 殷啟聰 <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 10:10 +0200
Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Good to Debian Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org> - 2016-05-17 10:50 +0200
Re: Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the Security Team? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-05-17 17:30 +0200
Re: Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the Security Team? Ralph Sanchez <rwsanchez3@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 17:40 +0200
Re: Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the Security Team? Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2016-05-18 12:00 +0200
Re: Will Packaging BoringSSL Bring Any Trouble to the Security Team? Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> - 2016-05-18 12:30 +0200
csiph-web