Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5914
| From | Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? |
| Date | 2021-01-14 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BxeBz-37j-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <Bvsz0-3ny-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <BwuS7-NP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <BwR2h-5So-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BwVpg-8gd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BwXho-VN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 13.01.21 23:49, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:49:43PM +0100, Christoph Pflügler wrote: >> [ 0.000000] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0xd6, >> date = 2019-10-03 >> [ 0.379026] SRBDS: Vulnerable: No microcode >> [ 1.625090] microcode: sig=0x506e3, pf=0x2, revision=0xd6 >> [ 1.625215] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.2. >> >> Seems like the microcode is applied to my CPUs. This is also >> supported by numerous other CVEs getting mitigated after >> intel-microcode installation. > > That's exactly the same signature I was testing with different results: > microcode: sig=0x506e3, pf=0x2, revision=0xd6 > > The only way I can get your results is to run unprivileged, but you > said you weren't doing that. The checks for 3640 and 3615 are > basically just looking for SSBD; in the top section the line that says > "CPU indicates SSBD capability" presumably says something other than > "YES (Intel SSBD)"? >> I also tried the latest meltdown-spectre-checker (v0.44), the results >> are the same (plus another red 2020 CVE). > > This is presumably CVE-2020-0543; if you look at the changelog for > intel-microcode it discusses that issue. You can install the backports > version which should fix that at the risk of a boot failure. > You are absolutely right, the SSBD lines say the following (when executed as root): * Speculative Store Bypass Disable (SSBD) * CPU indicates SSBD capability: UNKNOWN (is cpuid kernel module available?)
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> - 2021-01-08 21:30 +0100
Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> - 2021-01-08 22:50 +0100
Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-01-08 23:50 +0100
Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> - 2021-01-09 15:50 +0100
Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? James Wallen <jpwallen@comcast.net> - 2021-01-09 21:00 +0100
Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@debian.org> - 2021-01-12 17:40 +0100
Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-01-13 17:20 +0100
Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> - 2021-01-13 22:00 +0100
Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-01-14 00:00 +0100
Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> - 2021-01-14 18:30 +0100
Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-01-08 22:50 +0100
csiph-web