Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #5914

Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10?

From Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10?
Date 2021-01-14 18:30 +0100
Message-ID <BxeBz-37j-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <Bvsz0-3ny-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <BwuS7-NP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <BwR2h-5So-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BwVpg-8gd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BwXho-VN-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 13.01.21 23:49, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:49:43PM +0100, Christoph Pflügler wrote:
>> [    0.000000] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0xd6, 
>> date = 2019-10-03
>> [    0.379026] SRBDS: Vulnerable: No microcode
>> [    1.625090] microcode: sig=0x506e3, pf=0x2, revision=0xd6
>> [    1.625215] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.2.
>>
>> Seems like the microcode is applied to my CPUs. This is also 
>> supported by numerous other CVEs getting mitigated after 
>> intel-microcode installation.
>
> That's exactly the same signature I was testing with different results:
> microcode: sig=0x506e3, pf=0x2, revision=0xd6
>
> The only way I can get your results is to run unprivileged, but you 
> said you weren't doing that. The checks for 3640 and 3615 are 
> basically just looking for SSBD; in the top section the line that says 
> "CPU indicates SSBD capability" presumably says something other than 
> "YES (Intel SSBD)"?
>> I also tried the latest meltdown-spectre-checker (v0.44), the results 
>> are the same (plus another red 2020 CVE).
>
> This is presumably CVE-2020-0543; if you look at the changelog for 
> intel-microcode it discusses that issue. You can install the backports 
> version which should fix that at the risk of a boot failure.
>
You are absolutely right, the SSBD lines say the following (when 
executed as root):

   * Speculative Store Bypass Disable (SSBD)
     * CPU indicates SSBD capability:  UNKNOWN  (is cpuid kernel module 
available?)

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian 10? Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> - 2021-01-08 21:30 +0100
  Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian  10? Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> - 2021-01-08 22:50 +0100
    Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on  Debian 10? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-01-08 23:50 +0100
      Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian  10? Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> - 2021-01-09 15:50 +0100
        Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian  10? James Wallen <jpwallen@comcast.net> - 2021-01-09 21:00 +0100
          Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian  10? Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@debian.org> - 2021-01-12 17:40 +0100
            Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on  Debian 10? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-01-13 17:20 +0100
              Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian  10? Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> - 2021-01-13 22:00 +0100
                Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on  Debian 10? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-01-14 00:00 +0100
                Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on Debian  10? Christoph Pflügler <christoph@pfluegler.net> - 2021-01-14 18:30 +0100
  Re: intel-microcode not fixing CVE-2018-3640, CVE-2018-3615 on  Debian 10? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2021-01-08 22:50 +0100

csiph-web