Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #10157
| From | Matthew Vernon <matthewv@chiark.greenend.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct |
| Date | 2019-01-05 20:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xcZEd-Uu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <xcfUJ-6Wg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xchWy-86y-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <xcvPR-86P-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <xcvPR-86P-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <xcHeh-6tA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> writes: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 11:26:01AM +0000, Matthew Vernon wrote: >> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> writes: >> >> > On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 11:26 -0700, Eldon Koyle wrote: >> >> 5. There doesn't appear to be an appeals process (contact DAM?) >> > [...] >> > >> > There is, since any decision by the DPL or a delegate can be overridden >> > by General Resolution. >> >> This isn't really an appeals process in the usual sense, though - more a >> Big Red Button. DAM might like to consider letting the DPL be a point of >> review/appeal? > > Appeals to the DPL wouldn't be compatible with the current version of our > constitution. That is sort-of orthogonal to whether they'd be a good idea or not :) Yes, I see that the constitution specifically prohibits the DPL from withdrawing the delegation of a particular decision and from over-ruling delegates. Presumably DAM could say "we will voluntarily refer appeals to the DPL for their opinion and do as the DPL says", but that might be too much of subverting the intent of the constitution. I'm not sure we really want to have people delegated just to review DAM appeals... Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
On having and using a Code of Conduct Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2019-01-02 13:30 +0100
Compassion For Those Worried Whether They are Welcome Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2019-01-02 13:50 +0100
Re: Compassion For Those Worried Whether They are Welcome Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2019-01-02 14:30 +0100
Re: Compassion For Those Worried Whether They are Welcome Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2019-01-03 01:40 +0100
Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct Eldon Koyle <ekoyle@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 19:30 +0100
Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2019-01-03 21:40 +0100
Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> - 2019-01-04 12:30 +0100
Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> - 2019-01-05 00:40 +0100
Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct Matthew Vernon <matthewv@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2019-01-05 20:20 +0100
Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> - 2019-01-05 22:50 +0100
Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2019-01-04 23:00 +0100
Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> - 2019-01-05 00:40 +0100
Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> - 2019-01-05 00:40 +0100
Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct Eldon Koyle <ekoyle@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 03:10 +0100
csiph-web